Maximin fairness with mixed divisible and indivisible goods

被引:0
作者
Xiaohui Bei
Shengxin Liu
Xinhang Lu
Hongao Wang
机构
[1] Nanyang Technological University,School of Physical and Mathematical Sciences
[2] Harbin Institute of Technology,School of Computer Science and Technology
来源
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems | 2021年 / 35卷
关键词
Fair division; Mixed goods; Maximin fairness;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We study fair resource allocation when the resources contain a mixture of divisible and indivisible goods, focusing on the well-studied fairness notion of maximin share fairness (MMS). With only indivisible goods, a full MMS allocation may not exist, but a constant multiplicative approximate allocation always does. We analyze how the MMS approximation guarantee would be affected when the resources to be allocated also contain divisible goods. In particular, we show that the worst-case MMS approximation guarantee with mixed goods is no worse than that with only indivisible goods. However, there exist problem instances to which adding some divisible resources would strictly decrease the MMS approximation ratios of the instances. On the algorithmic front, we propose a constructive algorithm that will always produce an α\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha$$\end{document}-MMS allocation for any number of agents, where α\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\alpha$$\end{document} takes values between 1/2 and 1 and is a monotonically increasing function determined by how agents value the divisible goods relative to their MMS values.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]  
Abdulkadiroğlu A(2004)Room assignment-rent division: A market approach Social Choice and Welfare 22 515-538
[2]  
Sönmez T(1991)Fair allocation of indivisible goods and criteria of justice Econometrica 59 1023-1039
[3]  
Ünver MU(1987)Splitting necklaces Advances in Mathematics 63 247-253
[4]  
Alkan A(2017)Approximation algorithms for computing maximin share allocations ACM Transactions on Algorithms 13 52:1-52:28
[5]  
Demange G(2020)Approximation algorithms for maximin fair division ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation (TEAC) 8 5:1-5:28
[6]  
Gale D(2017)Competitive division of a mixed manna Econometrica 85 1847-1871
[7]  
Alon N(2016)Characterizing conflicts in fair division of indivisible goods using a scale of criteria Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 30 259-290
[8]  
Amanatidis G(2011)The combinatorial assignment problem: Approximate competitive equilibrium from equal incomes Journal of Political Economy 119 1061-1103
[9]  
Markakis E(2019)The unreasonable fairness of maximum Nash welfare ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation 7 12:1-12:32
[10]  
Nikzad A(2020)The complexity of cake cutting with unequal shares ACM Transactions on Algorithms (TALG) 16 29:1-29:21