The value of artificial intelligence for detection and grading of prostate cancer in human prostatectomy specimens: a validation study

被引:0
作者
Maíra Suzuka Kudo
Vinicius Meneguette Gomes de Souza
Carmen Liane Neubarth Estivallet
Henrique Alves de Amorim
Fernando J. Kim
Katia Ramos Moreira Leite
Matheus Cardoso Moraes
机构
[1] Laboratory of Image and Signal Processing of the Institute of Science and Technology of Federal University of São Paulo (Universidade Federal de São Paulo – UNIFESP),Denver Health Medical Center
[2] Laboratory of Medical Investigations Number 55 of the Sao Paulo University Medical School – FMUSP,undefined
[3] University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center,undefined
来源
Patient Safety in Surgery | / 16卷
关键词
Convolutional neural network; Artificial intelligence; Prostate cancer; Pathology; Biopsy image;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Sung H(2021)Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries CA Cancer J Clin 71 209-249
[2]  
Ferlay J(2018)Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part I: Risk Stratification, Shared Decision Making, and Care Options J Urol 199 683-690
[3]  
Siegel RL(2018)Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline. Part II: Recommended Approaches and Details of Specific Care Options J Urol 199 990-997
[4]  
Sanda MG(2016)The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System Am J Surg Pathol 40 244-52
[5]  
Cadeddu JA(1974)Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging J Urol 111 58-64
[6]  
Kirkby E(2002)Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. 1974 J Urol. 167 953-8
[7]  
Sanda MG(2017)Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical Staging J Urol 197 S134-S139
[8]  
Cadeddu JA(2016)Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer Scand J Urol 50 420-424
[9]  
Kirkby E(2017)Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors Prostate 77 681-685
[10]  
Epstein JI(2016)Interobserver Reproducibility of Percent Gleason Pattern 4 in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Prostate Biopsies Am J Surg Pathol 40 1686-1692