Genotype × environment interaction and genetic improvement for yield and yield stability of rainfed durum wheat in Iran

被引:7
作者
Reza Mohammadi
Ahmed Amri
机构
[1] Dryland Agricultural Research Institute (DARI),
[2] International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA),undefined
来源
Euphytica | 2013年 / 192卷
关键词
Durum wheat; GE interaction; Genetic gain; Stability parameters; Statistical methods; Static and dynamic stability; Rank correlation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The genotype × environment (GE) interaction influences genotype selection and recommendations. Consequently, the objectives of genetic improvement should include obtaining genotypes with high potential yield and stability in unpredictable conditions. The GE interaction and genetic improvement for grain yield and yield stability was studied for 11 durum breeding lines, selected from Iran/ICARDA joint program, and compared to current checks (i.e., one durum modern cultivar and two durum and bread wheat landraces). The genotypes were grown in three rainfed research stations, representative of major rainfed durum wheat-growing areas, during 2005–09 cropping seasons in Iran. The additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis, genotype plus GE (GGE) biplot analysis, joint regression analysis (JRA) (b and S2di), six stability parameters derived from AMMI model, two Kang’s parameters [i.e., yield-stability (YSi) statistic and rank-sum], GGE distance (mean performance + stability evaluation), and two adaptability parameters [i.e., TOP (proportion of environments in which a genotype ranked in the top third) and percentage of adaptability (Ad)] were used to analyze GE interaction in rainfed durum multi-environment trials data. The main objectives were to (i) evaluate changes in adaptation and yield stability of the durum breeding lines compared to modern cultivar and landraces (ii) document genetic improvement in grain yield and analyze associated changes in yield stability of breeding lines compared to checks and (iii) to analyze rank correlation among GGE biplot, AMMI analysis and JRA in ranking of genotypes for yield, stability and yield-stability. The results showed that the effects due to environments, genotypes and GE interaction were significant (P < 0.01), suggesting differential responses of the genotypes and the need for stability analysis. The overall yield was 2,270 kg ha−1 for breeding lines and modern cultivar versus 2,041 kg ha−1 for landraces representing 11.2 % increase in yield. Positive genetic gains for grain yield in warm and moderate locations compared to cold location suggests continuing the evaluation of the breeding material in warm and moderate conditions. According to Spearman’s rank correlation analysis, two types of associations were found between the stability parameters: the first type included the AMMI stability parameters and joint regression parameters which were related to static stability and ranked the genotypes in similar fashion, whereas the second type consisted of the rank-sum, YSi, TOP, Ad and GGED which are related to dynamic concept of stability. Rank correlations among statistical methods for: (i) stability ranged between 0.27 and 0.97 (P < 0.01), was the least between AMMI and GGE biplot, and highest for AMMI and JRA and (ii) yield-stability varied from 0.22 (between GGE and JRA) to 0.44 (between JRA and AMMI). Breeding lines G8 (Stj3//Bcr/Lks4), G10 (Ossl-1/Stj-5) and G12 (modern cultivar) were the best genotypes in terms of both nominal yield and stability, indicating that selecting for improved yield potential may increase yield in a wide range of environments. The increase in adaptation, yield potential and stability of breeding lines has been reached due to gradual accumulation of favorable genes through targeted crosses, robust shuttle breeding and multi-locational testing.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 249
页数:22
相关论文
共 183 条
[31]  
Sears RG(1998)Changes in adaptation of barley releases over time in north eastern Spain Plant Breed 117 531-535
[32]  
Martin TJ(2001)Heritability of and correlations among genotype-by-environment stability statistics for grain yield in bread wheat Theor Appl Genet 103 469-474
[33]  
Donmez E(1998)Methods for comparing the yield stability of cropping systems: a review J Agron Crop Sci 180 193-213
[34]  
Sears RG(2008)Barley adaptation and improvement in the Mediterranean basin Plant Breed 127 554-560
[35]  
Shroyer JP(2009)Raising yield potential in wheat J Exp Bot 60 1899-1918
[36]  
Paulsen GM(2003)Durum wheat quality in Mediterranean environments. III: stability and comparative methods in analyzing G × E interaction Field Crops Res 80 141-146
[37]  
Ebdon JS(2005)Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses Crop Sci 45 2414-2424
[38]  
Gauch HG(1972)Some aspects of partitioning genotype–environmental components of variability Heredity 28 237-245
[39]  
Eberhart SA(1997)Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean Crop Sci 37 383-390
[40]  
Russell WA(1967)Early generation selection under different environments as it influences adaptation of barley Can J Plant Sci 47 507-517