Australian diagnostic reference levels for multi detector computed tomography

被引:0
作者
Anna Hayton
Anthony Wallace
Paul Marks
Keith Edmonds
David Tingey
Peter Johnston
机构
[1] Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency,Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine Section
来源
Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine | 2013年 / 36卷
关键词
Diagnostic reference level; Computed tomography; Effective dose;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA) is undertaking web based surveys to obtain data to establish national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for diagnostic imaging. The first set of DRLs to be established are for multi detector computed tomography (MDCT). The survey samples MDCT dosimetry metrics: dose length product (DLP, mGy.cm) and volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol, mGy), for six common protocols/habitus: Head, Neck, Chest, AbdoPelvis, ChestAbdoPelvis and Lumbar Spine from individual radiology clinics and platforms. A practice reference level (PRL) for a given platform and protocol is calculated from a compliant survey containing data collected from at least ten patients. The PRL is defined as the median of the DLP/CTDIvol values for a single compliant survey. Australian National DRLs are defined as the 75th percentile of the distribution of the PRLs for each protocol and age group. Australian National DRLs for adult MDCT have been determined in terms of DLP and CTDIvol. In terms of DLP the national DRLs are 1,000 mGy cm, 600 mGy cm, 450 mGy cm, 700 mGy cm, 1,200 mGy cm, and 900 mGy cm for the protocols Head, Neck, Chest, AbdoPelvis, ChestAbdoPelvis and Lumbar Spine respectively. Average dose values obtained from the European survey Dose Datamed I reveal Australian doses to be higher by comparison for four out of the six protocols. The survey is ongoing, allowing practices to optimise dose delivery as well as allowing the periodic update of DRLs to reflect changes in technology and technique.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 26
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
Hart D(2009)National reference doses for common radiographic, fluoroscopic and dental X-ray examinations in the UK Br J Radiol 82 1-12
[2]  
Hillier MC(2005)Implementation of DRLs in the UK Radiat Prot Dosimetry 114 183-187
[3]  
Wall BF(2001)Diagnostic reference levels—the way forward Br J Radiol 74 785-788
[4]  
Wall BF(2006)National survey of doses from CT in the UK: 2003 Br J Radiol 79 968-980
[5]  
Wall BF(2011)Diagnostic reference levels From the ACR CT accreditation program J Am Coll Radiol 8 795-803
[6]  
Shrimpton PC(2005)Local diagnostic reference levels in standard X-ray examinations Radiat Prot Dosimetry 113 54-63
[7]  
Hillier MC(2010)Multidetector CT dose: clinical practice improvement strategies from a successful optimization program J Am Coll Radiol 7 614-624
[8]  
Lewis MA(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Dunn M(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
McCollough C(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined