A Recent Evaluation of Empirical Cephalosporin Treatment and Antibiotic Resistance of Changing Bacterial Profiles in Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis

被引:0
作者
Tolga Yakar
Mustafa Güçlü
Ender Serin
Hikmet Alışkan
机构
[1] Baskent University,Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Maremar Medical Center
[2] Baskent University,Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine
来源
Digestive Diseases and Sciences | 2010年 / 55卷
关键词
Ascites; Microbiology; Levofloxacin;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this research is to evaluate the recent changes in microorganisms causing spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhotic patients, antibiotic resistance, and response to empirical cephalosporin therapy. A total of 218 patients with ascites secondary to cirrhosis were enrolled. Parenteral cefotaxime or cefepime was given to patients who had a neutrophil count of 250/mm3 or more or a positive bacterial culture of ascitic fluid. Antibiotic failure was defined by an absence of clinical improvement and an insufficient decrease in neutrophil count of ascites (<25% of initial value) by the third day of therapy. Of all the patients, 44.6% had culture-negative neutrocytic ascites, 24.8% had spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and 10.1% had monomicrobial nonneutrocytic bacterascites. Growth in culture was observed in 76 patients (34.9%). The two most common isolated bacteria were Escherichia coli (33.8%) and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus (CoNS; 19.7%). The two cephalosporins were effective against E. coli (82%) and but not against CoNS (44%), while levofloxacin showed reasonable activity against both E. coli (71%) and CoNS (90%) in vitro. We confirmed a recent increased incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis caused by Gram-positive bacteria. Levofloxacin seems to be a good alternative treatment for patients with uncomplicated spontaneous ascites infections.
引用
收藏
页码:1149 / 1154
页数:5
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]  
Runyon BA(1987)Inoculation of blood culture bottles with ascitic fluid. Improved detection of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Arch Intern Med 147 73-75
[2]  
Umland ET(1988)Optimization of ascitic fluid culture technique Gastroenterology 95 1351-1355
[3]  
Merlin T(1990)Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: prevention and therapy Hepatology 12 776-781
[4]  
Runyon BA(1988)Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: an explosion of information Hepatology 8 171-175
[5]  
Canawati HN(2005)Increasing frequency of Gram-positive bacteria in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Liver Int 25 57-61
[6]  
Akriviadis EA(1998)Changes in nature and antibiotic resistance of bacteria causing peritonitis in cirrhotic patients over a 20-year period J Clin Pathol 51 614-616
[7]  
Hoefs JC(2003)Recent increase in antibiotic-resistant microorganisms in patients with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis adversely affects the clinical outcome in Korea J Gastroenterol Hepatol 18 927-933
[8]  
Runyon BA(1996)Randomized, comparative study of oral ofloxacin versus intravenous cefotaxime in spontaneous bacterial peritonitis Gastroenterology 111 1011-1017
[9]  
Cholongitas E(2000)Oral ciprofloxacin after a short course of intravenous ciprofloxacin in the treatment of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis: results of a multicenter, randomized study J Hepatol 33 564-569
[10]  
Papatheodoridis GV(1985)Cefotaxime is more effective than is ampicillin-tobramycin in cirrhotics with severe infections Hepatology 5 457-462