What are the impacts of nature conservation interventions on human well-being: A systematic map protocol

被引:35
作者
Bottrill M. [1 ]
Cheng S. [2 ]
Garside R. [3 ]
Wongbusarakum S. [4 ]
Roe D. [5 ]
Holland M.B. [6 ]
Edmond J. [1 ]
Turner W.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Conservation International, 2011 Crystal DriveSuite 500, Arlington
[2] Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
[3] University of Exeter, European Centre for Environment and Human Health, Truro
[4] Nature Conservancy, Worldwide Office, Arlington, VA
[5] International Institute for Environment and Development, 80-86 Grays Inn Road, London
[6] Department of Geography and Environmental Systems, University of Maryland-Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Cir, Baltimore
关键词
Conservation; Ecosystem services; Human Well-being; Poverty;
D O I
10.1186/2047-2382-3-16
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: International policy has sought to emphasize and strengthen the link between the conservation of natural ecosystems and human development. Furthermore, international conservation organizations have broadened their objectives beyond nature-based goals to recognize the contribution of conservation interventions in sustaining ecosystem services upon which human populations are dependent. While many indices have been developed to measure various human well-being domains, the strength of evidence to support the effects, both positive and negative, of conservation interventions on human well-being, is still unclear. Methods/Design: This protocol describes the methodology for examining the research question: What are the impacts of nature conservation interventions on different domains of human well-being in developing countries? Using systematic mapping, this study will scope and identify studies that measure the impacts of nature conservation interventions on human well-being at local to regional scales. The primary objective of this study is to synthesize the state and distribution of the existing evidence base linking conservation and human well-being. In addition, a theory of change approach will be used to identify and characterize the causal linkages between conservation and human well-being, with attention on those studies that examine the role of ecosystem services. Key trends among the resulting studies will be synthesized and the range of studies organized and presented in a graphical matrix illustrating the relationships between types of interventions and types of outcomes. Results of the study are intended to help conservation and development practitioners and the academic community to improve research studies and conservation practices in developing countries in order to achieve both conservation and human well-being outcomes. © 2014 Bottrill et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
(1980) World Conservation Strategy, , IUCN, UNEP and WWF International Union for Conservation of Nature with the United Nations Environment Programme and the Worldwide Wildlife Fund for Nature Gland, Switzerland
[2]  
Robinson, J., The Limits to Caring: Sustainable living and the loss of biodiversity (1993) Conserv Biol, 7, pp. 20-28
[3]  
Holdgate, M., (1999) The Green Web: A Union for World Conservation, , Earthscan London
[4]  
(2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Policy Responses: Findings of the Responses Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, , MEA Island Press Washington, D.C
[5]  
(2010) The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of TEEB, , TEEB
[6]  
(1992) Convention on Biological Diversity, , Secretariat for the Convention on Biological Diversity
[7]  
(2012) Report of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, , UN United Nations New York, NY
[8]  
(2013) The Millennium Development Goals Report, , UN United Nations New York, NY
[9]  
Leisher, C., Sanjayan, M., Blockhus, J., Larsen, N., Kontoleon, A., Does conserving biodiversity work to reduce poverty? A state of knowledge review (2012) Does Conserving Biodiversity Work to Reduce Poverty? A State of Knowledge Review). Pp. 143-159, pp. 143-159. , The Nature Conservancy, University of Cambridge, IIED Arlington, VA
[10]  
Roe, D., (2010) Walpole MJ (Eds.): Whose Value Counts? Trade-offs between Biodiversity Conservation and Poverty Reduction, , Chichester Wiley-Blackwell in association with the Zoological Society of London