Temporal order judgment criteria are affected by synchrony judgment sensitivity

被引：0

作者：

van Eijk R.L.J. ^{[1
]}

Kohlrausch A. ^{[1
,2
]}

Juola J.F. ^{[1
,3
]}

van de Par S. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven

[2] Philips Research Laboratories Eindhoven, Eindhoven

[3] University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS

[4] University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg

来源：

Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics | 2010年 / 72卷 / 8期

关键词：

Psychometric Function; Temporal Order Judgment; Visual Speech; Auditory Speech; Synchronous Response;

D O I：

10.3758/BF03196697

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Synchrony perception for audio-visual stimulus pairs is typically studied by using temporal order judgment (TOJ) or synchrony judgment (SJ) tasks. Research has shown that estimates of the point of subjective simultaneity (PSS) obtained using these two methods do not necessarily correspond. Here, we investigate the hypothesis that the PSS estimate obtained in a TOJ task is shifted in the direction of the most sensitive part of the synchrony judgment curve, as obtained in an SJ task. The results confirm that criterion shifts in the TOJ task move the PSS toward regions of the audio-visual temporal interval continuum where discriminations are most sensitive. © 2010 The Psychonomic Society, Inc.

引用

页码：2227 / 2235

页数：8

共 21 条

[1]

Arrighi R., Alais D., Burr D., Perceptual synchrony of audiovisual streams for natural and artificial motion sequences, Journal of Vision, 6, pp. 260-268, (2006)

[2]

Aschersleben G., Musseler J., Dissociations in the timing of stationary and moving stimuli, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, pp. 1709-1720, (1999)

[3]

Enoki K., Washikita K., Yamada M., Detection threshold of asynchrony between auditory and visual stimuli for various motion patterns of a ball, Proceedings of the 9th Western Pacific Acoustic Conference (WESPAC IX) [CD-ROM], (2006)

[4]

Fujisaki W., Shimojo S., Kashino M., Nishida S., Recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity, Nature Neuroscience, 7, pp. 773-778, (2004)

[5]

Lewald J., Guski R., Auditory-visual temporal integration as a function of distance: No compensation for sound-transmission time in human perception, Neuroscience Letters, 357, pp. 119-122, (2004)

[6]

Navarra J., Vatakis A., Zampini M., Soto-Faraco S., Humphreys W., Spence C., Exposure to asynchronous audiovisual speech extends the temporal window for audiovisual integration, Cognitive Brain Research, 25, pp. 499-507, (2005)

[7]

Smeele P.M.T., Perceiving speech: Integrating auditory and visual speech, (1994)

[8]

Spence C., Baddeley R., Zampini M., James R., Shore D.I., Multisensory temporal order judgments: When two locations are better than one, Perception & Psychophysics, 65, pp. 318-328, (2003)

[9]

Stone J.V., Hunkin N.M., Porrill J., Wood R., Keeler V., Beanland M., Et al., When is now? Perception of simultaneity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 268, pp. 31-38, (2001)

[10]

Ulrich R., Threshold models of temporal-order judgments evaluated by a ternary response task, Perception & Psychophysics, 42, pp. 224-239, (1987)

← 1 2 3 →