Does political risk undermine environment and economic development in Pakistan? Empirical evidence from China–Pakistan economic corridor

被引:0
作者
Junaid Ashraf
机构
[1] Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics,School of Statistics
来源
Economic Change and Restructuring | 2023年 / 56卷
关键词
Carbon emissions; Economic development; Political risk; CPEC; OBOR; Pakistan;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) invests US$62\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\text{US}}\$ 62$$\end{document} billion in Pakistan’s energy, infrastructure, and other development projects to step toward Eurasia’s economic integration. However, CPEC may exacerbate climate change vulnerabilities for Pakistan’s struggling economy due to potential environmental hazards and consequences. In this context, the current study seeks to examine the impact of political risk on carbon emissions and economic growth in Pakistan while also considering the relevance of trade openness, Chinese outward Foreign Direct Investment (FDI)\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$(\text{FDI})$$\end{document}, and One Belt One Road OBOR\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\left( \text{OBOR} \right)$$\end{document} policy. To investigate this impact, we use the autoregressive distributed lag technique to cointegration and the fully modified ordinary least squares estimator for robustness results, using data spanning 2000to2020\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$2000\,\, {\text{to }}\,\,2020$$\end{document}. Our empirical findings reveal that trade openness, FDI, and OBOR policy contribute to pollution and economic growth, but political stability slows the rate of environmental deterioration and increases economic growth. Furthermore, the existence of robust political stability mitigates the negative impacts of FDI and trade openness on the environment, while strong political stability aids the positive effects of FDI and trade openness on economic growth. Also, the findings confirmed that a better political environment promotes economic development while simultaneously lowering carbon emissions. Our results may assist the Government of Pakistan in transforming CPEC\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\text{CPEC}$$\end{document} into a model green OBOR\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\text{OBOR}$$\end{document} initiative in the region.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 608
页数:27
相关论文
共 202 条
[1]  
Abbasi F(2016)CO2 emissions and financial development in an emerging economy: an augmented VAR approach Energy Policy 84 8438-8451
[2]  
Riaz K(2020)Revisiting the EKC hypothesis in an emerging market: an application of ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches SN Appl Sci 29 251-276
[3]  
Adebayo TS(2021)An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: does institutional quality make a difference? Environ Impact Assess Rev 55 158-171
[4]  
Ahmad M(2019)FDI, income, and environmental pollution in Latin America: Replication and extensionusing panel quantiles regression analysis Energy Econ 35 4661-4663
[5]  
Ahmed Z(2018)Does institutional quality matter for trade? Inst Cond Sect Trade Framew World Dev: 27 2002-2010
[6]  
Majeed A(2022)The spillover effects of political risk, financial risk, and economic freedom on ecological footprint: empirical evidence from belt and road initiative countries Borsa Istanbul Rev 81 253-undefined
[7]  
Huang B(2022)Do political risk and globalization undermine environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries Manage Decis Econ 189 undefined-undefined
[8]  
Albulescu CT(2022)Do BRI policy and institutional quality influence economic growth and environmental quality? An empirical analysis from South Asian countries affiliated with the belt and road initiative Environ Sci Pollut Res undefined undefined-undefined
[9]  
Tiwari AK(2022)The spillover effects of institutional quality and economic openness on economic growth for the belt and road initiative (BRI) countries Spat Stat undefined undefined-undefined
[10]  
Yoon SM(2017)The dynamic impact of renewable energy and institutions on economic output and CO2 emissions across regions Renew Energy undefined undefined-undefined