Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Agriculture: Reconciling the Epistemological, Ethical, Political, and Practical Challenges

被引：0

作者：

Robert M. Chiles

Eileen E. Fabian

Daniel Tobin

Scott J. Colby

S. Molly DePue

机构：

[1] The Pennsylvania State University,Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education

[2] The Pennsylvania State University,Department of Food Science

[3] The Pennsylvania State University,Rock Ethics Institute

[4] The Pennsylvania State University,Department of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

[5] The University of Vermont College of Agriculture and Life Sciences,Department of Community Development and Applied Economics

来源：

Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics | 2018年 / 31卷

关键词：

Agricultural ethics; Climate change; Emissions measurement; Climate justice; Sustainability; Epistemology; Food politics; Governance; Science and technology studies;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The purpose of this paper is to provide further clarity to the technical and policy difficulties associated with mitigating greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture by identifying and distilling the core tensions which propagate and animate them. We argue that these complexities exist across four critical dimensions: the epistemological, the ethical, the political, and the practical. Adequately confronting the challenge of agricultural emissions will require improved transparency in emissions measurement, increased science communication, enhanced public participatory mechanisms, and the integration of ethical deliberation in scientific and policy discussions.

引用

页码：341 / 348

页数：7

共 28 条

[1]

Arbuckle JG(2013)Climate change beliefs, concerns, and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation among farmers in the Midwestern United States Climatic Change 117 943-950

[2]

Prokopy LS(2013)Trade, tastes, and nutrition in India The American Economic Review 103 1629-1663

[3]

Haigh T(2015)A new global climate agreement: Implications for agriculture? EuroChoices 14 4-9

[4]

Hobbs J(2007)Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: Epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research Qualitative Health Research 17 1316-1328

[5]

Knoot T(2009)The potentials and limitations of civil society research: Getting undone science done Sociological Inquiry 79 306-327

[6]

Knutson C(2014)“We don’t tell people what to do”: An examination of the factors influencing NGO decisions to campaign for reduced meat consumption in light of climate change Global Environmental Change 29 32-40

[7]

Loy A(2006)The marketplace of perceptions Harvard Magazine 108 50-892

[8]

Mase AS(2016)Re-framing the climate change debate in the livestock sector: Mitigation and adaptation options Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 7 869-268

[9]

McGuire J(2008)Epistemology The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research 1 264-undefined

[10]

Morton LW(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined

← 1 2 3 →