Blood Pressure Management in Intracranial Hemorrhage: Current Challenges and Opportunities

被引:7
作者
Carcel C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sato S. [1 ]
Anderson C.S. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Neurological and Mental Health Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW
[2] Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW
[3] Neurology Department, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW
[4] The George Institute for Global Health, PO Box M201, Missenden Road, Sydney, 2050, NSW
关键词
Blood pressure; Hypertension; Intensive blood pressure lowering; Intracerebral hemorrhage;
D O I
10.1007/s11936-016-0444-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Non-traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (i.e. intracerebral hemorrhage [ICH] and subarachnoid hemorrhage [SAH]) are more life threatening and least treatable despite being less common than ischemic stroke. Elevated blood pressure (BP) is a strong predictor of poor outcome in both ICH and SAH. Data from a landmark clinical trial INTERACT 2, wherein 2839 participants enrolled with spontaneous ICH were randomly assigned to receive intensive (target systolic BP <140 mmHg) or guideline recommended BP lowering therapy (target systolic BP <180 mmHg), showed that intensive BP lowering was safe, and more favorable functional outcome and better overall health-related quality of life were seen in survivors in the intensive treatment group. These results contributed to the shift in European and American guidelines towards more aggressive early management of elevated BP in ICH. In contrast, the treatment of BP in SAH is less well defined and more complex. Although there is consensus that hypertension needs to be controlled to prevent rebleeding in the acute setting, induced hypertension in the later stages of SAH has questionable benefits. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
[1]  
Krishnamurthi R.V., Et al., Global and regional burden of first-ever ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, Lancet Glob Health, 1, 5, pp. e259-e281, (2013)
[2]  
van Asch C.J., Et al., Incidence, case fatality, and functional outcome of intracerebral haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and ethnic origin: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Lancet Neurol, 9, 2, pp. 167-176, (2010)
[3]  
Anderson C.S., Et al., Predicting survival for 1 year among different subtypes of stroke. Results from the Perth Community Stroke Study, Stroke, 25, 10, pp. 1935-1944, (1994)
[4]  
Tuhrim S., Et al., Prediction of intracerebral hemorrhage survival, Ann Neurol, 24, 2, pp. 258-263, (1988)
[5]  
Barber M., Et al., Poor outcome in primary intracerebral haemorrhage: results of a matched comparison, Postgrad Med J, 80, 940, pp. 89-92, (2004)
[6]  
Portenoy R.K., Et al., Intracerebral haemorrhage: a model for the prediction of outcome, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 50, 8, pp. 976-979, (1987)
[7]  
Tatu L., Et al., Primary intracerebral hemorrhages in the Besancon stroke registry. Initial clinical and CT findings, early course and 30-day outcome in 350 patients, Eur Neurol, 43, 4, pp. 209-214, (2000)
[8]  
Smith E.E., Et al., White matter lesions, cognition, and recurrent hemorrhage in lobar intracerebral hemorrhage, Neurology, 63, 9, pp. 1606-1612, (2004)
[9]  
Brott T., Et al., Early hemorrhage growth in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, Stroke, 28, 1, pp. 1-5, (1997)
[10]  
Kazui S., Et al., Enlargement of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage. Incidence and time course, Stroke, 27, 10, pp. 1783-1787, (1996)