What makes an orthopaedic paper highly citable? A bibliometric analysis of top orthopeadic journals with 10-year follow up

被引:0
作者
Mirjam Lutter
Henrik Rudolf
Robert Lenz
Thilo Hotfiel
Thomas Tischer
机构
[1] University Medical Center Rostock,Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
[2] University Medical Center Rostock,Institute for Biostatistics and Informatics in Medicine and Ageing Research
[3] Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery Osnabrück (OZMC),undefined
[4] Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery,undefined
来源
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics | / 10卷
关键词
Bibliometric analysis; Orthopaedic; Citations; Top paper; Impact factor;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Ali MJ(2021)Questioning the Impact of the Impact Factor. A Brief Review and Future Directions Semin Ophthalmol 37 91-96
[2]  
Antoniou GA(2015)Bibliometric analysis of factors predicting increased citations in the vascular and endovascular literature Ann Vasc Surg 29 286-292
[3]  
Antoniou SA(2020)The Top 50 Most Influential Articles in Hip Arthroscopy Arthroscopy 36 716-722
[4]  
Georgakarakos EI(2021)Impact of country self citation on the ranking of the top 50 countries in clinical neurology eNeurologicalSci 23 100333-280
[5]  
Barbera J(2020)The relationship between citations, downloads and alternative metrics in rheumatology publications: a bibliometric study Rheumatology (Oxford) 59 277-290
[6]  
Selverian S(1994)Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology Psychol Assess 6 284-2122
[7]  
Courington R(2019)Bibliometric analysis of research relating to hypertension reported over the period 1997–2016 J Hypertens 37 2116-255
[8]  
Bardeesi AM(2018)The Altmetric Attention Score: What Does It Mean and Why Should I Care? Toxicol Pathol 46 252-61
[9]  
Jamjoom AAB(2013)The impact of article length on the number of future citations: a bibliometric analysis of general medicine journals PLoS One 8 e49476-94
[10]  
Sharab MA(2002)An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land Lancet 359 57-481