Attitudes toward medicalization in childbirth and their relationship with locus of control and coping in a Spanish population

被引:0
作者
Maite Espinosa
Isabel Artieta-Pinedo
Carmen Paz-Pascual
Paola Bully-Garay
Arturo García-Álvarez
机构
[1] Osakidetza-Basque Health Service,Associate Professor of the School of Nursing
[2] Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute,Lecturer in the Midwifery Training Unit of the Basque Country
[3] Primary Care Midwife Zuazo Health Centre,undefined
[4] OSI BARAKALDO-SESTAO-OSAKIDETZA,undefined
[5] University of the Basque Country,undefined
[6] C/ Barrio Sarriena S/N,undefined
[7] Primary Care Midwife Markonzaga Health Centre,undefined
[8] OSI BARAKALDO-SESTAO-OSAKIDETZA,undefined
[9] Hospital de Basurto-OSAKIDETZA,undefined
[10] Paola Bully Methodological and Statistical Consultant,undefined
[11] Osakidetza,undefined
[12] University of Basque Country,undefined
[13] University of Laval,undefined
[14] Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute,undefined
来源
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | / 22卷
关键词
Attitude towards medicalization of childbirth; Locus of control; Coping; Pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The dominant model of childbirth in most Western countries is medicalized childbirth. Women's beliefs about whether childbirth should be a medicalized process to a greater or lesser degree may be related, in addition to contextual factors, to internal factors. The objective of the study is to find out if women’s locus of control (LC) and stress coping strategies (CS) are related to having a more favourable or less favourable attitude towards medicalization (ATMC). A cross-sectional study was carried out with the participation of 248 women recruited in primary care centres by their midwives. All the women filled in answers on a mobile phone app with various different measurement instruments: the questionnaire created by Benyamini to evaluate their ATMC; the Spanish version of the Wallston MLC to evaluate their LC; and the Spanish adaptation of the “Revised Prenatal Coping Inventory (NuPCI)” scale for the assessment of their CS. The women presented a favourable attitude towards medicalization, with a mean ATMC score of 3.42. Both the LC and the CS of women during pregnancy are related to this attitude. Specifically, having an internal LC and using preparative CS both lower the probability of presenting a favourable attitude towards medicalization, while the lack of a paid job raises the probability. For each point in internal locus and preparatory coping, the ATMC score decreased by 0.02 and 0.23 points, respectively, while it increased by 0.18 for not having a paid job. The influence of these psychological factors must be taken into account in the development of content and interventions that promote a more natural birth.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 144 条
[1]  
Benyamini Y(2017)Women’s attitudes towards the medicalization of childbirth and their associations with planned and actual modes of birth Women Birth 30 424-430
[2]  
Molcho ML(2013)Tensions around risks in pregnancy: a typology of women's experiences of surveillance medicine Soc Sci Med 93 55-63
[3]  
Dan U(2013)First do no harm: interventions during childbirth J Perinat Educ 22 83-92
[4]  
Gozlan M(2017)The concept of medicalisation reassessed Sociol Health Illn 39 759-774
[5]  
Preis H(2003)Limits to medicine Medical nemesis: the expropriation of health J Epidemiol Community Health 57 928-885
[6]  
Hammer RP(2002)In search of "non-disease" BMJ 324 883-167
[7]  
Burton-Jeangros C(2018)The evolution of birth medicalisation: A systematic review Midwifery 66 161-14
[8]  
Jansen L(2005)The shifting engines of medicalization J Health Soc Behav 46 3-36
[9]  
Gibson M(2008)Electronic support groups, patient-consumers, and medicalization: the case of contested illness J Health Soc Behav 49 20-945
[10]  
Bowles BC(2002)Consumer demand for caesarean sections in Brazil: informed decision making, patient choice, or social inequality? A population based birth cohort study linking ethnographic and epidemiological methods BMJ 324 942-286