Estimation of water resources availability (WRA) using gridded evapotranspiration data: A simpler alternative to Central Water Commission’s WRA assessment

被引:0
作者
Gopi Goteti
机构
来源
Journal of Earth System Science | / 131卷
关键词
Water resources availability; Central Water Commission; evapotranspiration; remote sensing; hydrology; land surface models;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Central Water Commission (CWC) revised its estimates of water resources availability (WRA) for river basins of India in June 2019 (CWC19). Despite more than six years of modelling effort, several major drawbacks remain – the model needs extensive inputs on water management and seasonal crop growth; model calibration is cumbersome and not very effective; and, it cannot be easily extended to other years or ungauged basins. This paper proposes a conceptually equivalent, but simpler, alternative to estimate WRA using evapotranspiration (ET) products based on remote sensing or land surface models (ETRS). In this approach, WRA is formulated in terms of ET and necessary assumptions are made to account for ET from irrigated areas. The proposed alternative does not involve any modelling, does not require any inputs on water management or crop growth, and is applicable even in ungauged basins. The analysis presented here has two main parts. In the first part, since ETRS products are prone to systematic biases they are evaluated for their validity against basin-scale proxy observations of ET. In the second part, the validated ETRS products are used to estimate WRA using the proposed approach. Over Godavari and Krishna river basins of peninsular India, and also 15 sub-basins within these two basins, five state-of-the-art ETRS products (ERA5-Land, GLEAM, NTSG/MOD16, NTSG/PLSH and FEWS/SSEBop) are evaluated. At a basin-scale two of these products, ERA5 and SSEBop, are found to have limited bias and reasonably captured annual basin-scale ET. Using these two products, WRA is estimated for the two basins and their 15 sub-basins. Resulting WRA estimates are found to be similar to, and highly consistent with, those from CWC19. Potential causes of discrepancies in WRA between CWC19 and this study are discussed, drawbacks of this approach and potential improvements, and next steps in expanding this work to other river basins of India are also discussed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Goroshi S(2017)Trend analysis of evapotranspiration over India: Observed from long-term satellite measurements J. Earth Syst. Sci. 126 1-21
[2]  
Pradhan R(2021)Robust historical evapotranspiration trends across climate regimes Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 25 3855-3874
[3]  
Singh RP(2019)The groundwater recovery paradox in South India Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 9602-9611
[4]  
Singh K(2020)Global trends in evapotranspiration dominated by increases across large cropland regions Rem. Sens. 12 1221-532
[5]  
Parihar JS(2015)Spatial evapotranspiration, rainfall and land use data in water accounting-part 1: Review of the accuracy of the remote sensing data Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 19 507-2472
[6]  
Hobeichi S(2013)Water accounting plus (WA+) - a water accounting procedure for complex river basins based on satellite measurements Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 17 2459-1734
[7]  
Abramowitz G(2017)Assessment of uncertainties in global land cover products for hydro-climate modeling in India Water Resour. Res. 53 1713-9441
[8]  
Evans JP(2019)Does ERA-5 outperform other reanalysis products for hydrologic applications in India? J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 124 9423-469
[9]  
Hora T(2011)Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 15 453-108
[10]  
Srinivasan V(2008)On variability of hydrological wet season, seasonal rainfall and rainwater potential of the river basins of India (1813–2006) J. Hydrol. Res. Dev. 23 79-299