Prophylaxis against Herpesvirus Infections in Transplant Recipients

被引:0
作者
Per Ljungman
机构
[1] Huddinge University Hospital,Department of Haematology
[2] Karolinska Institutet,undefined
来源
Drugs | 2001年 / 61卷
关键词
Herpes Simplex Virus; Ganciclovir; Allogenic Stem Cell Transplant; Cidofovir; Foscarnet;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Herpesvirus infections are important after stem cell and organ transplant. During the last decades several antiviral agents have been introduced with efficacy against herpesviruses. These agents are the nucleoside analogues aciclovir, valaciclovir, famciclovir, and ganciclovir; the nucleotide analogue cidofovir; and the pyrophosphate analogue foscarnet. Several studies have been performed with antiviral agents with the aim to reduce morbidity and mortality associated with herpesvirus infections in transplant recipients. Aciclovir and valaciclovir have been examined in randomised, controlled trials in both solid organ and stem cell transplant patients, and were shown to be very effective for the prevention of herpes simplex virus (HSV) and varicella-zoster virus infections. In addition, these drugs were shown to reduce cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and improve survival in allogenic stem cell transplant patients and to reduce CMV infection, CMV disease (aciclovir and valaciclovir), and acute rejection (valaciclovir) in renal transplant patients. Ganciclovir is very effective for the prevention of CMV infection and disease in both stem cell and solid organ transplant recipients. It can also be used in preemptive strategies in which the aim is to prevent CMV disease in patients who have ongoing CMV infection documented by antigenaemia or detection of CMV DNA. The latter strategy has the advantage of reducing the exposure to the drug and thereby the risk for toxicity. Foscarnet has also been shown to be effective as preemptive therapy for CMV in allogenic stem celltransplant patients and as therapy for aciclovir-resistant HSV infections. Finally cidofovir is an interesting agent with broad spectrum antiherpesvirus efficacy. However, because of the drug’s toxicity profile, further studies are needed.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 196
页数:9
相关论文
共 185 条
[1]  
Harm IM(1983)Acyclovir prophylaxis against herpes virus infections in severely immunocompromised patients: randomised double blind trial Br Med J Clin Res Ed 287 384-8
[2]  
Prentice HG(1981)Acyclovir prophylaxis of herpes-simplex-virus infections N Engl J Med 305 63-7
[3]  
Blacklock HA(1986)Long-term acyclovir prophylaxis in bone marrow transplant recipients and lymphocyte proliferation responses to herpes virus antigens Bone Marrow Transplant 1 185-92
[4]  
Saral R(1988)Prevention of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in recipients of HLA-matched T-lymphocyte-depleted bone marrow allografts Isr J Med Sci 24 145-50
[5]  
Burns WH(1983)Prophylaxis of herpes infections after bone-marrow transplantation by oral acyclovir Lancet II 706-8
[6]  
Laskin OL(1984)Oral acyclovir for prevention of herpes simplex virus reactivation after marrow transplantation Ann Intern Med 100 823-8
[7]  
Ljungman P(1984)Recurrent infection with herpes simplex virus after marrow transplantation: role of the specific immune response and acyclovir treatment J Infect Dis 149 750-6
[8]  
Wilczek H(1987)Sequential intravenous and twice-daily oral acyclovir for extended prophylaxis of herpes simplex virus infection in marrow transplant patients Transplantation 43 654-8
[9]  
Gahrton G(1985)Prophylactic oral acyclovir after renal transplantation Transplantation 39 279-81
[10]  
Engelhard D(1985)Prevention of herpesvirus infections in renal allograft recipients by low-dose oral acyclovir JAMA 254 3435-8