Using policy codesign to achieve multi-sector alignment in adolescent behavioral health: a study protocol

被引:1
作者
Walker, Sarah Cusworth [1 ]
Ahrens, Kym R. [2 ]
Owens, Mandy D. [3 ]
Parnes, Mckenna [2 ]
Langley, Joe [4 ]
Ackerley, Christine [1 ]
Purtle, Jonathan [5 ]
Saldana, Lisa [6 ]
Aarons, Gregory A. [8 ]
Hogue, Aaron [9 ]
Palinkas, Lawrence A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Seattle Childrens Hosp & Res Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[3] Univ Washington, Addict Drug & Alcohol Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[4] Sheffield Hallam Univ, Lab Living, Sheffield, England
[5] NYU, Global Ctr Implementat Sci, Dept Publ Hlth Policy & Management, New York, NY USA
[6] Chestnut Hlth Syst, Lighthouse Inst, Eugene, OR USA
[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Herbert Wertheim Sch Publ Hlth & Human Longev Sci, La Jolla, CA USA
[8] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Psychiat, UC San Diego ACTRI Disseminat & Implementat Sci Ct, La Jolla, CA USA
[9] Partnership End Addict, New York, NY USA
来源
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE COMMUNICATIONS | 2024年 / 5卷 / 01期
关键词
Policy design; Formation; Evidence use; Adolescent; Substance use; Behavioral health; IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE; COLLABORATION; COMMUNITY; MODEL; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/s43058-024-00583-y
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Policymaking is quickly gaining focus in the field of implementation science as a potential opportunity for aligning cross-sector systems and introducing incentives to promote population health, including substance use disorders (SUD) and their prevention in adolescents. Policymakers are seen as holding the necessary levers for realigning service infrastructure to more rapidly and effectively address adolescent behavioral health across the continuum of need (prevention through crisis care, mental health, and SUD) and in multiple locations (schools, primary care, community settings). The difficulty of aligning policy intent, policy design, and successful policy implementation is a well-known challenge in the broader public policy and public administration literature that also affects local behavioral health policymaking. This study will examine a blended approach of coproduction and codesign (i.e., Policy Codesign), iteratively developed over multiple years to address problems in policy formation that often lead to poor implementation outcomes. The current study evaluates this scalable approach using reproducible measures to grow the knowledge base in this field of study.Methods This is a single-arm, longitudinal, staggered implementation study to examine the acceptability and short-term impacts of Policy Codesign in resolving critical challenges in behavioral health policy formation. The aims are to (1) examine the acceptability, feasibility, and reach of Policy Codesign within two geographically distinct counties in Washington state, USA; (2) examine the impact of Policy Codesign on multisector policy development within these counties using social network analysis; and (3) assess the perceived replicability of Policy Codesign among leaders and other staff of policy-oriented state behavioral health intermediary organizations across the USA.Discussion This study will assess the feasibility of a specific approach to collaborative policy development, Policy Codesign, in two diverse regions. Results will inform a subsequent multi-state study measuring the impact and effectiveness of this approach for achieving multi-sector and evidence informed policy development in adolescent SUD prevention and treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]   Collaboration, Negotiation, and Coalescence for Interagency-Collaborative Teams to Scale-Up Evidence-Based Practice [J].
Aarons, Gregory A. ;
Fettes, Danielle L. ;
Hurlburt, Michael S. ;
Palinkas, Lawrence A. ;
Gunderson, Lara ;
Willging, Cathleen E. ;
Chaffin, Mark J. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD AND ADOLESCENT PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 43 (06) :915-928
[2]  
Abuse S., 2020, Key Substance Use and Mental Health Indicators in the United States: Results from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health
[3]   Collaborative governance in theory and practice [J].
Ansell, Chris ;
Gash, Alison .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2008, 18 (04) :543-571
[4]   Applying hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies in equity-centered policy implementation science [J].
Asada, Yuka ;
Kroll-Desrosiers, Aimee ;
Chriqui, Jamie F. ;
Curran, Geoffrey M. ;
Emmons, Karen M. ;
Haire-Joshu, Debra ;
Brownson, Ross C. .
FRONTIERS IN HEALTH SERVICES, 2023, 3
[5]  
Awenva AD, 2010, AFR J PSYCHIATRY, V13, P184
[6]  
Booher D., 2004, National Civic Review, V93, P32, DOI DOI 10.1002/NCR.69
[7]  
Braun V., 2006, Qual. Res. Psychol., V3, P77, DOI [10.1191/1478088706qp063oa, DOI 10.1080/10875549.2021.1929659, DOI 10.1191/1478088706QP063OA, DOI 10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238]
[8]   Evidence Check: knowledge brokering to commission research reviews for policy [J].
Campbell, Danielle ;
Donald, Braedon ;
Moore, Gabriel ;
Frew, Deborah .
EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2011, 7 (01) :97-107
[9]   A scoping review of law enforcement drug seizures and overdose mortality in the United States [J].
Cano, Manuel ;
Timmons, Patricia ;
Hooten, Madeline ;
Sweeney, Kaylin ;
Oh, Sehun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY, 2024, 124
[10]   Overdose deaths involving synthetic opioids: Racial/ethnic and educational disparities in the eastern and western US [J].
Cano, Manuel ;
Mendoza, Natasha ;
Ignacio, Matt ;
Rahman, Abir ;
Daniulaityte, Raminta .
DRUG AND ALCOHOL DEPENDENCE, 2023, 251