Contemporary Risk Assessment Tools: Should We Use Them for Sexually Abusive Children Ages 4 to 12 Years?

被引:0
作者
L. C. Miccio-Fonseca
机构
[1] Clinic for the Sexualities,
来源
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma | 2020年 / 13卷
关键词
ACE study; Children with sexual behavior problems; Sexually abusive children; Sexually abusive youth; Recidivism; risk assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Empirical findings are reported on an age group of sexually abusive youth (4–12 years) not commonly studied. Findings are from major studies employing the ecologically framed MEGA♪ risk assessment tool: MEGA♪Combined Samples Studies (N = 3901 [1979–2017] (Miccio-Fonseca Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth, 2018a, Journal of Child and Adolescent Trauma, 2018b) and MEGA♪Combined Cross Validation Studies (N = 2717). Samples consisted of male, female, and transgender-female, ages 4–19 with coarse sexual improprieties and/or sexually abusive youth, including youth with low intellectual functioning. Findings provided normative data, with cut-off scores according to age and gender, establishing four (calibrated) risk levels: Low, Moderate, High, and Very-High. The fourth risk level, Very-High Risk, sets MEGA♪ apart from other risk assessment tools by the ability to assess those few most seriously concerning and/or dangerous youth, whereas other risk tools (with three risk levels) do not make this differentiation.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 76 条
[1]  
Allen B(2016)Children with sexual behavior problems: Clinical characteristics and relationship to child maltreatment Child Psychiatry and Human Development 48 189-199
[2]  
Borja SE(2009)The trauma outcome process assessment model: A structural equation model examination of adjustment Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 18 532-552
[3]  
Callahan JL(2013)Test of the trauma outcome process assessment model: One model of individual and environmental factors to explain adjustment Traumatology 19 268-279
[4]  
Callahan JL(2008)Assessing risk of reoffending in adolescents who have committed a sexual offense: The accuracy of clinical judgments after completion of risk assessment instruments Behavioral Sciences & the Law 26 511-528
[5]  
Borja SE(2009)Understanding child sexual behavior problems: A developmental psychopathology framework Clinical Psychology Review 29 586-598
[6]  
Herbert GL(1998)Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults American Journal of Preventive Medicine 14 245-258
[7]  
Maxwell K(1991)Normative sexual behavior in children American Academy of Pediatrics 88 3-438
[8]  
Ruggero CJ(2007)Predicting recidivism in adolescent sexual offenders Aggression and Violent Behavior 12 427-935
[9]  
Elkovitch N(2018)Important considerations in selecting a risk assessment tool Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Special Issue on Risk Assessment of Sexually Abusive Youth 27 918-95
[10]  
Viljoen JL(2017)Sexual reoffense trajectories with youths in the child welfare system Child Abuse and Neglect 68 81-58