Review of the management of recurrent inguinal hernia

被引:39
|
作者
Richards S.K. [1 ]
Vipond M.N. [1 ]
Earnshaw J.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gloucestershire Royal Hospital, GL1 3NN Gloucester, Great Western Road
关键词
Complications; Hernia; Hernia mesh; Recurrence;
D O I
10.1007/s10029-003-0194-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is little available evidence on the optimal management of recurrent inguinal hernia, particularly if the original procedure involved the use of mesh. This study was a review of recurrent hernia repair in a district hospital, involving both laparoscopic and open procedures. Methods: The case notes of all patients who had a repair of a recurrent hernia between 1991 and 2000, inclusive, were examined; 171 procedures were included. Where known, the original repair was a nylon darn in 31%, mesh repair in 18%, and laparoscopic repair in 8%. Results: The recurrent hernia was repaired using a Lichtenstein open mesh technique in 63% and by the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) method in 22%. Complication rates were highest after emergency surgery (all had open surgery), where 71% had complications and one patient died. For elective repairs, complication rates were similar after open (13%) and TEP (8%) repairs. The duration of hospital stay was also similar (1.2 vs 1.3 days, respectively), and a single recurrence was seen in each group. Patients with recurrence after primary mesh repair were also managed by both techniques with similar results. Open re-operation for mesh failure was technically straightforward. Conclusions: Most recurrent hernias are still repaired by open techniques. There was no convincing evidence of different outcomes for open and TEP repairs in this review. Even when the original hernia repair involved the use of mesh, further open repair by an experienced surgeon is justified. © Springer-Verlag 2003.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 148
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A simplified surgical technique for recurrent inguinal hernia repair following total extraperitoneal patch plastic
    Knyazeva, P.
    Alesina, P. F.
    Stadelmeier, P.
    Anaya-Cortez, M.
    Walz, M. K.
    HERNIA, 2017, 21 (05) : 799 - 801
  • [22] Non-mesh inguinal hernia repair: Review
    Sapiyeva, S. T.
    Abatov, N. T.
    Aliyakparov, M. T.
    Badyrov, R. M.
    Yoshihiro, N.
    Brizitskaya, L. V.
    Yesniyazov, D. K.
    Yukhnevich, Y. A.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 47 (11) : 4669 - 4673
  • [23] Biological meshes for inguinal hernia repair - review of the literature
    Koeckerling, Ferdinand
    Alain, Nasra N.
    Narang, Sunil K.
    Daniels, Ian R.
    Smart, Neil J.
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2015, 2
  • [24] WORK RELATED ASPECTS OF INGUINAL HERNIA: A LITERATURE REVIEW
    Hendry, P. O.
    Paterson-Brown, S.
    de Beaux, A.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2008, 6 (06): : 361 - 365
  • [25] Inguinal Endometriosis in a Nulliparous Woman Mimicking an Inguinal Hernia: A Case Report with Literature Review
    AlSinan, Fatima M.
    Alsakran, Abdulelah S.
    Foula, Mohammed S.
    Al Omoush, Tahseen M.
    Al-Bisher, Hassan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS, 2021, 22
  • [26] Outcome of sliding inguinal hernia repair
    Adams, R. A.
    Wysocki, A. P.
    HERNIA, 2010, 14 (01) : 47 - 49
  • [27] Outcome of sliding inguinal hernia repair
    R. A. Adams
    A. P. Wysocki
    Hernia, 2010, 14 : 47 - 49
  • [28] Evaluation criteria of inguinal hernia repair
    Lerut, J
    Foxius, A
    Collard, A
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 1998, 98 (03) : 127 - 131
  • [29] Clinical value of the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal technique in recurrent inguinal hernia repair
    Liu, Yuchen
    Zhu, Yilin
    Cao, Jinxin
    Chen, Jie
    Zou, Zhenyu
    Zhang, Guangyong
    Wang, Minggang
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 43 (10) : 986 - 990
  • [30] Recurrent inguinal hernia: randomized multicenter trial comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein repair
    A. Eklund
    C. Rudberg
    C. -E. Leijonmarck
    I. Rasmussen
    L. Spangen
    G. Wickbom
    U. Wingren
    A. Montgomery
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2007, 21 : 634 - 640