Offsetting impacts of development on biodiversity and ecosystem services

被引:0
作者
Laura J. Sonter
Ascelin Gordon
Carla Archibald
Jeremy S. Simmonds
Michelle Ward
Jean Paul Metzger
Jonathan R. Rhodes
Martine Maron
机构
[1] The University of Queensland,Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science
[2] The University of Queensland,School of Earth and Environmental Sciences
[3] RMIT University,School of Global Urban and Social Studies
[4] Universidade de São Paulo,Laboratório de Ecologia da Paisagem e Conservação, Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biociências
来源
Ambio | 2020年 / 49卷
关键词
Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Mitigation hierarchy; Offsetting; Trade-offs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Offsetting—trading losses in one place for commensurate gains in another—is a tool used to mitigate environmental impacts of development. Biodiversity and carbon are the most widely used targets of offsets; however, other ecosystem services are increasingly traded, introducing new risks to the environment and people. Here, we provide guidance on how to “trade with minimal trade-offs”— i.e. how to offset impacts on biodiversity without negatively affecting ecosystem services and vice versa. We briefly survey the literature on offsetting biodiversity, carbon and other ecosystem services, revealing that each subfield addresses unique issues (often overlooking those raised by others) and rarely assesses potential trade-offs. We discuss key differences between offsets that trade biodiversity and those that trade ecosystem services, conceptualise links between these different targets in an offsetting context and describe three broad approaches to manage potential trade-offs. We conclude by proposing a research agenda to strengthen the outcomes of offsetting policies that are emerging internationally.
引用
收藏
页码:892 / 902
页数:10
相关论文
共 242 条
  • [1] Agrawal A(2011)Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation Annual Review of Environment and Resources 36 373-396
  • [2] Nepstad D(2013)Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: Land use in the United Kingdom Science 341 45-50
  • [3] Chhatre A(2009)Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: A meta-analysis Science 325 1121-1124
  • [4] Bateman IJ(2018)The local costs of biodiversity offsets: Comparing standards, policy and practice Land Use Policy 77 43-50
  • [5] Harwood AR(2017)The sweet and the bitter: Intertwined positive and negative social impacts of a biodiversity offset Conservation and Society 15 1-13
  • [6] Mace GM(2018)Restoration to offset the impacts of developments at a landscape scale reveals opportunities, challenges and tough choices Global Environmental Change 52 152-161
  • [7] Watson RT(2018)Ensuring no net loss for people and biodiversity: Good practice principles Oxford 28 799-809
  • [8] Abson DJ(2014)Importance of baseline specification in evaluating conservation interventions and achieving no net loss of biodiversity Conservation Biology 34 1-32
  • [9] Andrews B(2014)Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demand: Concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification Landscape Online 7 7357-7378
  • [10] Binner A(2015)The biodiversity offsetting dilemma: Between economic rationales and ecological dynamics Sustainability 2 35-49