A new objective definition of quantum entanglement as potential coding of intensive and effective relations

被引:0
作者
C. de Ronde
C. Massri
机构
[1] University of Buenos Aires - CONICET,Philosophy Institute Dr. A. Korn
[2] Vrije Universiteit Brussel,Center Leo Apostel for Interdisciplinary Studies, Foundations of the Exact Sciences
[3] National University Arturo Jauretche,Institute of Engineering
[4] Institute of Mathematical Investigations Luis A. Santaló,undefined
[5] UBA - CONICET,undefined
[6] University CAECE,undefined
来源
Synthese | 2021年 / 198卷
关键词
Logos; Entanglement; Potential coding; Intensive relation; Effective relation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In de Ronde and Massri (Against ‘particle metaphysics’ and ‘collapses’ within the definition of quantum entanglement, submitted, 2019b) it was argued against the orthodox definition of quantum entanglement in terms of pure and separable states. In this paper we attempt to discuss how the logos categorical approach to quantum mechanics (de Ronde and Massri in Int J Theor Phys, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10773-018-3914-0; in Int J Theor Phys 58:1968–1988, 2019a) is able to provide an objective formal account of the notion of entanglement—completely independent of both purity and separability—in terms of the potential coding of intensive relations and effective relations. We will show how our novel redefinition allows us to provide an anschaulich content to the notion of entanglement, erasing in this way the “spookiness” still present within its orthodox understanding in terms of space-time separated collapse particles.
引用
收藏
页码:6661 / 6688
页数:27
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Adámek J(1986)Cartesian closed categories, quasitopoi and topological universes Commentationes Mathaticae Universitatis Carolinae 27 235-257
[2]  
Herrlich H(2005)Niels Bohr’s generalization of classical mechanics Foundations of Physics 35 347-371
[3]  
Bokulich P(1995)Why modal interpretations of quantum mechanics must abandon classical reasoning about physical properties International Journal of Theoretical Physics 34 1302-1312
[4]  
Bokulich A(1996)The properties of modal interpretations of quantum mechanics British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 371-398
[5]  
Clifton RK(2010)Entanglement for all quantum states European Journal of Physics 31 325-332
[6]  
Clifton RK(2017)Causality and the modeling of the measurement process in quantum theory Disputatio 9 657-690
[7]  
de la Torre AC(2018)Quantum superpositions and the representation of physical reality beyond measurement outcomes and mathematical structures Foundations of Science 23 621-648
[8]  
Goyeneche D(2019)Unscrambling the omelette of quantum contextuality (part I): Preexistent properties or measurement outcomes? Foundations of Science 13 12-38
[9]  
Leitao L(2011)La notion d’entité en tant qu’obstacle épistémologique: Bachelard, la mécanique quantique et la logique Bulletin des Amis de Gaston Bachelard 2 107-130
[10]  
de Ronde C(2019)Quantum probability: A reliable tool for an agent or a source of reality Synthese 58 1968-1988