Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran

被引：0
作者：
Mehdi Jamshidmoghaddam
Sayyed Saeid Pourdad
机构：
[1] Dry-land Agricultural Research Institute (DARI),Oilseed Breeders
来源：
Euphytica | 2013年 / 190卷
关键词：
L.; Safflower; AMMI model; Stability parameters; GGE biplot;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction (GEI) is an important component of the variety selection process in multi-environment trials. The objectives of this study were first to analyze GEI on seed yield of 18 spine safflower genotypes grown for three consecutive seasons (2008–2011) at three locations, representative of rainfed winter safflower growing areas of Iran, by the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, and second to compare AMMI-derived stability statistics with several stability different methods, and two stability analysis approaches the yield-stability (Ysi) and the GGE (genotype + genotype × environment) biplot that are widely used to identify high-yielding and stable genotypes. The results of the AMMI analysis showed that main effects due to genotype, environment, and GEI as well as first six interaction principle component axes (IPCA1 to 6) were significant (P < 0.01). According to most stability statistics of AMMI analyses, genotypes G5 and G14 were the most stable genotypes across environments. According to the adjusted stability variance (s2), the high-yielding genotype, G2, was unstable due to the heterogeneity caused by environmental index. Based on the definition of stable genotypes by regression method (b = 1, Sd2 = 0), genotypes G11, G9, G14, G3, G12 and G13 had average stability for seed yield. Stability parameters of Tai indicated that genotype G5 had specific adaptability to unfavorable environments. The GGE biplot and the Ysi statistic gave similar results in identifying genotype G2 (PI-209295) as the best one to release for rainfed conditions of Iran. The factor analysis was used for grouping all stability parameters. The first factor separated static and dynamic concepts of stability, in which the Ysi and GGED (i.e., the distance from the markers of individual genotypes to the ideal genotype) parameters had a dynamic concept of stability, and the other remaining parameters had static concept of stability.
引用
收藏
页码：357 / 369
页数：12
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [21] Chen H(2006)Adaptability and stability of bean cultivars as determined via yield-stability statistic and GGE biplot analysis J Crop Improv 15 97-120
  • [22] Zhang Y(1985)Procedural approach for assessing cultivar-location data: pairwise genotype–environment interactions of test cultivars with checks Can J Plant Sci 65 1065-1071
  • [23] Tan J(1993)Genotype selection via a new yield-stability statistic in maize yield trials Euphytica 70 105-111
  • [24] Xu C(2009)Analysis of genotype × environment interactions for grain yield in durum wheat Crop Sci 49 1177-1186
  • [25] Finlay KW(1987)Studies on estimation of phenotypic stability: tests of significance for nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability Biometrics 43 45-53
  • [26] Wilkinson GN(1996)Yield stability and adaptation of Nordic barleys Euphytica 92 191-202
  • [27] Gauch HG(1993)Genotype-by-environment interactions of barley in the mediterranean region Crop Sci 33 669-674
  • [28] Gravois KA(1997)Agronomic performance and stability of soybean varieties grown in three maturity zones of Minnesota J Prod Agric 10 425-430
  • [29] Bernhardt JL(2000)Genotype × environment interaction of winter wheat in South Africa: II. Stability analysis of yield performance S Afr J Plant Soil 17 101-107
  • [30] Haynes KG(2005)Targeting cultivars onto rice growing environments using AMMI and SREG GGE biplot analyses Crop Sci 45 2414-2424
12345678910