Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran

被引:0
作者
Mehdi Jamshidmoghaddam
Sayyed Saeid Pourdad
机构
[1] Dry-land Agricultural Research Institute (DARI),Oilseed Breeders
来源
Euphytica | 2013年 / 190卷
关键词
L.; Safflower; AMMI model; Stability parameters; GGE biplot;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction (GEI) is an important component of the variety selection process in multi-environment trials. The objectives of this study were first to analyze GEI on seed yield of 18 spine safflower genotypes grown for three consecutive seasons (2008–2011) at three locations, representative of rainfed winter safflower growing areas of Iran, by the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, and second to compare AMMI-derived stability statistics with several stability different methods, and two stability analysis approaches the yield-stability (Ysi) and the GGE (genotype + genotype × environment) biplot that are widely used to identify high-yielding and stable genotypes. The results of the AMMI analysis showed that main effects due to genotype, environment, and GEI as well as first six interaction principle component axes (IPCA1 to 6) were significant (P < 0.01). According to most stability statistics of AMMI analyses, genotypes G5 and G14 were the most stable genotypes across environments. According to the adjusted stability variance (s2), the high-yielding genotype, G2, was unstable due to the heterogeneity caused by environmental index. Based on the definition of stable genotypes by regression method (b = 1, Sd2 = 0), genotypes G11, G9, G14, G3, G12 and G13 had average stability for seed yield. Stability parameters of Tai indicated that genotype G5 had specific adaptability to unfavorable environments. The GGE biplot and the Ysi statistic gave similar results in identifying genotype G2 (PI-209295) as the best one to release for rainfed conditions of Iran. The factor analysis was used for grouping all stability parameters. The first factor separated static and dynamic concepts of stability, in which the Ysi and GGED (i.e., the distance from the markers of individual genotypes to the ideal genotype) parameters had a dynamic concept of stability, and the other remaining parameters had static concept of stability.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 369
页数:12
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [11] Dehghani H(1988)Model selection for yield trials with interaction Biometrics 44 705-715
  • [12] Omidi H(2000)Heritability and genotype × environment interactions for discolored rice kernels Crop Sci 40 314-318
  • [13] Sabaghnia N(1995)Genotype × environment interactions for specific gravity in diploid potatoes Crop Sci 35 977-981
  • [14] Dehghani H(1993)Selection for yield and stability among oat lines Crop Sci 33 423-426
  • [15] Sabaghpour SH(2010)Genotype by environment interactions in wheat quality breeding programs in southeast Europe Euphytica 174 315-324
  • [16] Ebadi A(1990)Nonparametric measures of phenotypic stability. Part 1: theory Euphytica 47 189-194
  • [17] Eberhart SA(2008)Safflower winter survival and selection response relates to fall growth morphology and acclimation capacity Crop Sci 48 1872-1880
  • [18] Russell WA(1993)Simultaneous selection for yield and stability in crop performance trials: consequences for growers Agron J 85 754-757
  • [19] Fan XM(1989)Genotype × environment interaction in maize Agron J 81 662-664
  • [20] Kang MS(1984)Genotype × environment interactions for cane and sugar yield and their implications in sugarcane breeding Crop Sci 24 435-440