Genotype × environment interactions for seed yield in rainfed winter safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) multi-environment trials in Iran

被引:0
作者
Mehdi Jamshidmoghaddam
Sayyed Saeid Pourdad
机构
[1] Dry-land Agricultural Research Institute (DARI),Oilseed Breeders
来源
Euphytica | 2013年 / 190卷
关键词
L.; Safflower; AMMI model; Stability parameters; GGE biplot;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction (GEI) is an important component of the variety selection process in multi-environment trials. The objectives of this study were first to analyze GEI on seed yield of 18 spine safflower genotypes grown for three consecutive seasons (2008–2011) at three locations, representative of rainfed winter safflower growing areas of Iran, by the additive main effects and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) model, and second to compare AMMI-derived stability statistics with several stability different methods, and two stability analysis approaches the yield-stability (Ysi) and the GGE (genotype + genotype × environment) biplot that are widely used to identify high-yielding and stable genotypes. The results of the AMMI analysis showed that main effects due to genotype, environment, and GEI as well as first six interaction principle component axes (IPCA1 to 6) were significant (P < 0.01). According to most stability statistics of AMMI analyses, genotypes G5 and G14 were the most stable genotypes across environments. According to the adjusted stability variance (s2), the high-yielding genotype, G2, was unstable due to the heterogeneity caused by environmental index. Based on the definition of stable genotypes by regression method (b = 1, Sd2 = 0), genotypes G11, G9, G14, G3, G12 and G13 had average stability for seed yield. Stability parameters of Tai indicated that genotype G5 had specific adaptability to unfavorable environments. The GGE biplot and the Ysi statistic gave similar results in identifying genotype G2 (PI-209295) as the best one to release for rainfed conditions of Iran. The factor analysis was used for grouping all stability parameters. The first factor separated static and dynamic concepts of stability, in which the Ysi and GGED (i.e., the distance from the markers of individual genotypes to the ideal genotype) parameters had a dynamic concept of stability, and the other remaining parameters had static concept of stability.
引用
收藏
页码:357 / 369
页数:12
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [1] Annicchhiarico P(1997)Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype-environment interactions for cereals in Italy Euphytica 94 53-62
  • [2] Bacusmo JL(1988)Comparison of methods of determining stability and adaptation of sweet potato Theor Appl Genet 75 492-497
  • [3] Collins WW(1981)Correlations among some statistical measures of phenotypic stability Euphytica 30 835-840
  • [4] Jones A(1988)Stability analysis in plant breeding Plant Breed 101 1-23
  • [5] Becker HC(1990)Additive main effects and multiplicative interaction analysis of two international maize cultivar trials Crop Sci 30 493-500
  • [6] Becker HC(2008)Graphic analysis of trait relations of rapeseed using the biplot method Agron J 100 1443-1449
  • [7] Leon J(2010)Study of genotype × environment interaction for chickpea yield in Iran Agron J 102 1-8
  • [8] Crossa J(1966)Stability parameters for comparing varieties Crop Sci 6 36-40
  • [9] Gauch HG(2007)Yield stability of maize hybrid evaluated in multi-environment trials in Yunnan, China Agron J 99 220-228
  • [10] Zobel RW(1963)The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme Aust J Agric Res 14 742-754