Public-Private Partnerships, Dividing Operational Stage, and Optimal Governance Structures

被引:0
作者
Oshima K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Economics, University of Marketing and Distribution Sciences, 3-1 Gakuen Nishi-machi, Nishi-ku, 651-2188, Kobe
关键词
Bundling; Incomplete contracts; Property rights; Public-private partnerships;
D O I
10.1007/s11115-015-0321-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Public-Private Partnerships (PPP) include various governance structures which distribute tasks and ownership of facility differently. Many earlier theoretical studies using the incomplete contracts theory assume two tasks, building and operation, for the projects of public services. This may be too simple, however, to consider complicated projects such as prisons. Critics argue that those studies could not fully explain the reality. In addition, Those models are not suitable for comparing different PPP approaches such as Private Finance Initiative (PFI) and private management. The present paper divides the task of operation into two (maintenance and security). This enables us to compare four relevant governance structures in a single framework, and to suggest the conditions for successful PPP prison projects. The main findings are that the tasks of maintenance and security should be conducted by different parties (private consortium and civil servant) under certain conditions, while unbundling construction and operation stages is desirable in other cases. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 459
页数:16
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Bennett J., Iossa E., Building and managing facilities for public services, Journal of Public Economics, 90, pp. 2143-2160, (2006)
  • [2] Chen B.R., Chiu Y.S., Public-private partnerships: task interdependence and contractibility, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 28, pp. 591-603, (2010)
  • [3] Cabral S., Saussier S., Organizing prisons through public-private partnerships: a cross-country investigation, Brazilian Administration Review, 10, pp. 100-120, (2013)
  • [4] Greco L., Imperfect bundling in public-private partnerships. Department of Economics and Management. University of Padua, “Marco Fanno, Working Papers n, (2012)
  • [5] Hart O., Shleifer A., Vishny R.W., The proper scope of government: theory and an application to prisons, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, pp. 1127-1161, (1997)
  • [6] Hart O., Incomplete contracts and public ownership: remarks and application to public-private partnerships, The Economic Journal, 113, pp. 69-76, (2003)
  • [7] Hoppe E.I., Kusterer D.J., Schmitz P.W., Public-private partnerships versus traditional procurement: an experimental investigation, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 89, pp. 145-166, (2013)
  • [8] Hoppe E.I., Schmitz P.W., Public versus private ownership: Quantity contracts and the allocation of investment tasks, Journal of Public Economics, 94, pp. 258-268, (2010)
  • [9] Iossa E., Martimort D., The simple micro-economics of public private partnerships, Department of Economics, (2008)
  • [10] National Audit Office, PFI: Construction Performance, (2003)