DOS between revolution and reform

被引:0
作者
Brdar M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Philosophy Faculty, Novi Sad
来源
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law | 2002年 / 15卷 / 2期
关键词
Political System; Slow Pace; Institutional Reform; Apply Linguistics; Semiotic Analysis;
D O I
10.1023/A:1015825718275
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of the paper is to explore some of the main reasons for the slow pace of legal and political institutional reform in Serbia and Yugoslavia following the change of political regime on October 5, 2000. The analysis is carried out in two ways. First, an investigation of the semiotic/narrative or discursive constructions offered formally or informally by the new government is conducted. Second, an analysis of the institutional structure of the new political system is undertaken. One result of the analysis is a demonstration that the new system is profoundly structurally analogous to the prior communist regime. The execution of the original promises of reform is fettered by the extra-institutional position DOS occupies as the key agent of all political and economic changes. Hence, the prospects are grim. This is further argued through the semiotic analysis (semantics, syntax and pragmatics) of the DOS' discourse and its constant deployment of words such as "democracy", "freedom", and "reform" with messianic political zeal. The article concludes that in order for any serious reform to take place the process of institutionalizing political power must be completed first. However, this is unlikely to happen for it would require a self-elimination of DOS as the supreme ruler operating over and above the parliament. © 2002 Kluwer Law International.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 201
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   HOW CAN THE INSTITUTIONAL REFORM CONTRIBUTE TO IMPROVE WATER EFFICIENCY? [J].
Ciomos, Vasile ;
Zaharia, Valentina ;
Danciu, Radu .
METALURGIA INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 14 :133-135
[42]   Institutional reforms in the field: The example of the reform "Armed Forces XXI" [J].
Buffat, Aurelien .
SWISS POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2007, 13 (02) :261-289
[43]   How might reform of the political system appeal to discontented citizens? [J].
Seyd, Ben ;
Curtice, John ;
Rose, Jonathan .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICS & INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS, 2018, 20 (02) :263-284
[44]   Foreign direct investment and institutional reform: evidence and an application to Portugal [J].
Julio, Paulo ;
Pinheiro-Alves, Ricardo ;
Tavares, Jose .
PORTUGUESE ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2013, 12 (03) :215-250
[45]   Foreign direct investment and institutional reform: evidence and an application to Portugal [J].
Paulo Júlio ;
Ricardo Pinheiro–Alves ;
José Tavares .
Portuguese Economic Journal, 2013, 12 :215-250
[46]   Enlargement and institutional reform in the European Union: Separate or connected issues? [J].
Steunenberg B. .
Constitutional Political Economy, 2001, 12 (4) :351-370
[47]   The reform of Welfare Regimes in Costa Rica, Chile, Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay [J].
Sanchez de Dios, Manuel .
POLITICA Y SOCIEDAD, 2015, 52 (03) :661-690
[48]   Dynamic reform of public institutions: A model of motivated agents and collective reputation [J].
Valasek, Justin .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2018, 168 :94-108
[49]   The Meloni-Casellati Institutional Reform Towards a New Government System? [J].
Improta, Marco ;
Marzi, Paolo .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARLIAMENTARY STUDIES, 2024, 4 (02) :161-181
[50]   Recent Developments of China's Institutional Reform for Ocean Management: An Appraisal [J].
Deng, Yuncheng ;
Shi, Yubing .
COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 51 (02) :91-114