Preferred place of care and place of death of the general public and cancer patients in Japan

被引:0
作者
Akemi Yamagishi
Tatsuya Morita
Mitsunori Miyashita
Saran Yoshida
Nobuya Akizuki
Yutaka Shirahige
Miki Akiyama
Kenji Eguchi
机构
[1] Seirei Christopher University,Department of Nursing
[2] Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital,Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Palliative Care Team, and Seirei Hospice
[3] Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Palliative Nursing, Health Sciences
[4] The University of Tokyo,Department of Clinical Psychology, Graduate School of Education
[5] Chiba Cancer Center,Psycho
[6] Shirahige Clinic,Oncology Division
[7] Keio University,Faculty of Policy Management
[8] Teikyo University School of Medicine,Department of Internal Medicine
来源
Supportive Care in Cancer | 2012年 / 20卷
关键词
Preference; End-of-life; Home; Palliative care; Hospice;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Dying at a favorite place is one of the important determinants for terminally ill cancer patients. The primary aim was to clarify (1) differences in preferred place of care and place of death among the general public across four areas across Japan and (2) preferred place of care and place of death among community-representative cancer patients. A cross-sectional mail survey was conducted on 8,000 randomly selected general population. We examined preferred place of care and place of death using two vignettes and obtained a total of 3,984 (50%) responses. For the pain scenario, approximately 50% of the general public throughout four areas chose home as their preferred place of care; and for the dependent-without-pain scenario, about 40% chose home as preferred place of care. In cancer patients, for both scenarios, approximately 40% chose home as the preferred place of care, and they were significantly less likely to choose home. The most preferred combination of place of care and place of death was home hospice for both groups. Although there were statistically significant differences in preferred place of care and place of death among the four regions, the absolute difference was less than 8%. Independent determinants of choosing home as place of care included concern about family burden and being unable to adequately respond to sudden changes out of working hours. In conclusion, establishing more accessible home and hospice service is strongly required through arranging regional resources to reduce family burden, alleviating patient-perceived burdens, and improving 24-h support at home.
引用
收藏
页码:2575 / 2582
页数:7
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]  
Steinhauser KE(2000)Factors considered important at the end of life by patients, family, physicians, and other care providers JAMA 284 2476-2482
[2]  
Christakis NA(2007)Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study Ann Oncol 18 1090-1097
[3]  
Clipp EC(2010)The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomized controlled trial BMJ 340 c1345-450
[4]  
McNeilly M(2007)Preferred place of care: an analysis of the ‘first 100’ patient assessments Palliat Med 21 449-670
[5]  
McIntyre L(2009)GPs’ awareness of patients’ preference for place of death Br J Gen Pract 59 665-300
[6]  
Tulsky JA(2000)Place of care in advanced cancer: a qualitative systematic literature review of patient preferences J Palliat Med 3 287-1547
[7]  
Miyashita M(2007)Preferences regarding end-of-life cancer care and associations with good-death concepts: a population-based survey in Japan Ann Oncol 18 1539-521
[8]  
Sanjo M(2006)Factors influencing death at home in terminally ill patients with cancer: systematic review BMJ 332 515-429
[9]  
Morita T(2004)Predictors of place of death for Japanese patients with advanced-stage malignant disease in home care settings: a nationwide survey Cancer 101 421-453
[10]  
Hirai K(2006)Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia Palliat Med 20 447-572