Human Rights and the New Corporate Accountability: Learning from Recent Developments in Corporate Criminal Liability

被引:0
作者
Aurora Voiculescu
机构
[1] Westminster University,Department of Advanced Legal Studies, School of Law
来源
Journal of Business Ethics | 2009年 / 87卷
关键词
business and human rights; corporate agency; corporate social responsibility; human rights; SRSG 3rd report; UN;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The 3rd Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General of the United Nations appears to have generated significant consensus around its approach to business and human rights. This state of harmony relies mainly upon a narrow mandate limiting the endeavour largely to a mapping exercise. It also relies upon a process of ‘operationalisation’ that is yet to be undertaken despite the recent release of a 4th Report. After a brief presentation of the main parameters of the framework proposed by the 3rd Report and of its precarious advantage over other similar initiatives, this article takes a close look at the main link that needs to be operationalised: i.e. the link between corporate responsibility for human rights and the concept of legal and criminal responsibility. The article then addresses the constitutive elements of the concept of responsibility to shed light upon the responsibility of business organisations in a human rights law context. It looks at the innovative ways in which the concept of corporate criminal responsibility has been dealt with in various domestic jurisdictions and at the new paradigms of corporate agency resulting in the process. Building on this inquiry, the analysis focusses on the way in which the legal discourse acquires new dimensions of corporate responsibility by moving away from an individualistic perspective. On the basis of this, the article suggests conceptual tools that can become instrumental in the process of the operationalisation of the 3rd Report, albeit at the likely cost of rendering the consensus around it more fragile.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 432
页数:13
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Backer L. C.(2006)Multinational Corporations, Transnational Law: The United Nations’ Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations as a Harbinger of Corporate Social Responsibility in International Law Columbia Human Rights Law Review 37 287-389
[2]  
Belcher A.(2002)Corporate Killing as a Corporate Governance Issue Corporate Governance 10 47-54
[3]  
Haines F.(2002)Towards Understanding Globalisation and Control of Corporate Harm: A Preliminary Criminological Analysis Current Issues in Criminal Justice 12 166-174
[4]  
Kinley D.(2007)The UN Human Rights Norms for Corporations: The Private Implications of Public International Law Human Rights Law Review 6 447-497
[5]  
Chambers R.(2007)Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law Modern Law Review 70 598-625
[6]  
McCorquodale R.(2006)Dworkin on the Semantics of Legal and Political Concepts Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 545-557
[7]  
Simons P.(2003)Emerging Threat: Human Rights Claims Harvard Business Review 81 16-18
[8]  
Patterson D.(2006)Collective Responsibility, Corporate Responsibility and Moral Taint Midwest Studies in Philosophy 30 269-278
[9]  
Schrage E.(2003)Corporate Versus Individual Moral Responsibility Journal of Business Ethics 46 143-150
[10]  
Silver D.(2002)The Amorality of Profit: Transnational Corporations and Human Rights Berkeley Journal International Law 20 45-67