Negative Pressure Therapy Versus Conventional Dressing for Management of Anastomotic Leak After Transhiatal Esophagectomy

被引:0
作者
Monika Gureh
Sanjay Gupta
Ashok K. Attri
机构
[1] Government Medical College and Hospital,Department of Surgery
来源
Indian Journal of Surgery | 2021年 / 83卷
关键词
Esophagectomy; Anastomotic leak; Negative pressure therapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis is done for esophageal carcinoma and various benign lesions of the esophagus. Cervical anastomotic (CA) leak following THE is a serious complication that adds significantly to morbidity. As these leaks usually manifest in neck, local wound care is one of the essential components to manage such leaks. This study aims to evaluate the effect of negative pressure therapy (NPT) on healing of cervical wound following CA leaks. The record of all patients, who underwent THE for benign or malignant lesion of the esophagus from 2012 to 2019, was retrospectively analyzed. Of all the patients who had CA leak, patients with type II CA leak were only included for further analysis. The outcome of the patients who received NPT for wound care was compared with those who received simple wound dressings in terms of time to oral feed, hospital stay, mortality, and dysphagia at 6 months. Seventy-two patients were thus identified and 18 (25%) had an anastomotic leak. Patients with type II leaks (n = 16) were successfully managed by conservative approach. NPT for wound care in these patients was associated with significant reduction in hospital stay and early resumption of oral intake (p < 0.05) as compared with simple wound dressings. Conservative approach is effective for management of CA leaks. NPT for wound care significantly reduces associated morbidity.
引用
收藏
页码:1192 / 1197
页数:5
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [1] Orringer MB(1978)Esophagectomy without thoracotomy J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 76 643-654
  • [2] Sloan H(2019)The cost burden of clinically significant esophageal anastomotic leaks-a steep price to pay Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 157 2086-2092
  • [3] Agzarian J(2019)Management of intrathoracic and cervical anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review World J Emerg Surg 14 17-94
  • [4] Visscher SL(2018)Esophagocoloplasty fistula successfully treated with vacuum-assisted closure J Surg Case Rep 2018 rjx256-289
  • [5] Knight AW(2004)Vacuum assisted closure system in the management of cervical anastomotic leakage after gastric pull-up Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 3 92-137
  • [6] Allen MS(2015)International consensus on standardization of data collection for complications associated with esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) Ann Surg 262 286-560
  • [7] Cassivi SD(2019)Management of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: when to intervene? J Thorac Dis 11 131-184
  • [8] Nichols FC(2018)Intrathoracic versus cervical anastomosis and predictors of anastomotic leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer Br J Surg 105 552-37
  • [9] Verstegen MHP(2009)Analysis of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection Ann Thorac Surg 88 177-126
  • [10] Bouwense SAW(2019)Evaluation of preoperative risk factors and postoperative indicators for anastomotic leak of minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis J Cardiothorac Surg 14 46-8