Effect of environmental taxes on environmental innovation and carbon intensity in China: an empirical investigation

被引:0
作者
Qian Zhang
Saba Anwer
Muhammad Hafeez
Atif Khan Jadoon
Zahoor Ahmed
机构
[1] Hubei University of Technology,School of Economics and Management
[2] Pakistan Institute of Development Economics (PIDE),Institute of Business Management Sciences (IBMS)
[3] University of Agriculture,School of Economics
[4] University of Punjab,Department of Business Administration, Faculty of Management Sciences
[5] ILMA University,undefined
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
Environmental taxes; Environmental innovation; CO; intensity; QARDL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Environmental taxes are deemed to be an important carbon mitigating factor and also encourage the producers to adopt environmentally friendly technologies. Therefore, the main objective of the analysis is to evaluate the environmental taxes on environmental innovations and carbon intensity in China. The novel quantile autoregressive distributed lag (QARDL) is applied to investigate the model empirically. From the results, we confer that the short and long run estimated coefficients of environmental taxes are positive and significant at most quantiles in the environmental innovation model, implying that the higher the rate of environmental taxes, the higher the rate of environment-related innovations. However, the estimates of environmental taxes are significant and negative in both short and long run at more than half quantiles in the carbon emissions model, suggesting the positive role of environmental taxes in reducing carbon emissions. In general, our findings imply that an increase in environment-related taxes helps reduce carbon intensity and promote environmental innovation in China. The study suggests that policymakers in China should promote environmental innovation and expand the environmental tax base to achieve the objective of carbon neutrality.
引用
收藏
页码:57129 / 57141
页数:12
相关论文
共 188 条
[1]  
Bocken NM(2012)Strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of consumer goods by influencing stakeholders J Clean Prod 35 118-129
[2]  
Allwood JM(2019)Can the Paris deal boost SDGs achievement? An assessment of climate mitigation co-benefits or side-effects on poverty and inequality World Dev 122 96-109
[3]  
Campagnolo L(2018)The impact of environmental regulation, shadow economy, and corruption on environmental quality: theory and empirical evidence from China J Clean Prod 195 200-214
[4]  
Davide M(2021)Carbon tax and energy innovation at crossroads of carbon neutrality: designing a sustainable decarbonization policy J Environ Manag 294 112957-300
[5]  
Chen H(2015)Quantile cointegration in the autoregressive distributed-lag modeling framework J Econom 188 281-533
[6]  
Hao Y(2022)The impact of informal economy on technological innovation-ecological footprint nexus in OECD countries: new evidence from panel quantile regression J Environ Stud Sci 12 515-49723
[7]  
Li J(2022)The nexus between environmental regulation and ecological footprint in OECD countries: empirical evidence using panel quantile regression Environ Sci Pollut Res 29 49700-383
[8]  
Song X(2003)Determining the trade–environment composition effect: the role of capital, labor and environmental regulations J Environ Econ Manag 46 363-2489
[9]  
Cheng Y(2019)Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development Sci Total Environ 650 2483-656
[10]  
Sinha A(2022)How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies? Renew Energy 187 645-291