Visual Attention Patterns of Women with Androphilic and Gynephilic Sexual Attractions

被引:0
作者
Samantha J. Dawson
Katherine M. Fretz
Meredith L. Chivers
机构
[1] Queen’s University at Kingston,354 Humphrey Hall, Department of Psychology
[2] Queen’s University at Kingston,218 Craine Hall, Department of Psychology
来源
Archives of Sexual Behavior | 2017年 / 46卷
关键词
Gender specificity; Eye tracking; Visual attention; Information processing model; Sexual orientation; Sexual arousal;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Women who report exclusive sexual attractions to men (i.e., androphilia) exhibit gender-nonspecific patterns of sexual response—similar magnitude of genital response to both male and female targets. Interestingly, women reporting any degree of attraction to women (i.e., gynephilia) show significantly greater sexual responses to stimuli depicting female targets compared to male targets. At present, the mechanism(s) underlying these patterns are unknown. According to the information processing model (IPM), attentional processing of sexual cues initiates sexual responding; thus, attention to sexual cues may be one mechanism to explain the observed within-gender differences in specificity findings among women. The purpose of the present study was to examine patterns of initial and controlled visual attention among women with varying sexual attractions. We used eye tracking to assess visual attention to sexually preferred and nonpreferred cues in a sample of 164 women who differed in their degree of androphilia and gynephilia. We found that both exclusively and predominantly androphilic women showed gender-nonspecific patterns of initial attention. In contrast, ambiphilic (i.e., concurrent androphilia and gynephilia) and predominantly/exclusively gynephilic women oriented more quickly toward female targets. Controlled attention patterns mirrored patterns of self-reported sexual attractions for three of these four groups of women, such that gender-specific patterns of visual attention were found for androphilic and gynephilic women. Ambiphilic women looked significantly longer at female targets compared to male targets. These findings support predictions from the IPM and suggest that both initial and controlled attention to sexual cues may be mechanisms contributing to within-gender variation in sexual responding.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 153
页数:12
相关论文
共 217 条
  • [1] Baumeister RF(2000)Gender differences in erotic plasticity: The female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive Psychological Bulletin 126 347-374
  • [2] Blanchard R(2001)Sensitivity and specificity of the phallometric test for pedophilia in nonadmitting sex offenders Psychological Assessment 13 118-126
  • [3] Klassen P(2015)Gender-specificity of genital response and self-reported sexual arousal in women endorsing facets of bisexuality Journal of Bisexuality 15 180-203
  • [4] Dickey R(2002)Attentional resources measured by reaction times highlight differences within pleasant and unpleasant, high arousing stimuli Motivation and Emotion 26 123-138
  • [5] Kuban ME(2004)Gaze patterns when looking at emotional pictures: Motivationally biased attention Motivation and Emotion 28 221-243
  • [6] Blak T(1995)The development and validation of the Body-Image Ideals Questionnaire Journal of Personality Assessment 64 466-477
  • [7] Bouchard KN(2005)A brief review and discussion of sex differences in the specificity of sexual arousal Sexual and Relationship Therapy 20 377-390
  • [8] Timmers AD(2010)A brief update on the specificity of sexual arousal Sexual and Relationship Therapy 25 407-414
  • [9] Chivers ML(2005)A sex difference in features that elicit genital response Biological Psychology 70 115-120
  • [10] Buodo G(2015)Straight but not narrow: Within-gender variation in the gender-specificity of women’s sexual response PLoS One 15 736-744