Durability of amalgam in the restoration of class II cavities in primary molars: a systematic review of the literature.

被引:23
作者
Kilpatrick N.M. [1 ]
Neumann A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Dentistry, Royal Children's Hospital and Oral Health Research Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Dental amalgam; primary teeth; restorations;
D O I
10.1007/BF03262564
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To review the available literature on the durability of amalgam when used to restore interproximal (class II) cavities in primary molars. METHODS: The literature was searched using OVID Medline and EMBASE from 1966 to 2006. The search plan of the electronic databases included: "dental amalgam or amalgam or alloy" and "deciduous or primary or milk or first or baby or natal" or "tooth or teeth or dentition" and "permanent restorations or permanent fillings". Relevant prospective clinical studies were reviewed by 2 reviewers against a set of defined criteria. Papers were graded according to the number of criteria met as A = >90%, B1 = 75%, B2 = 50% and C = <50%. RESULTS: No study achieved a Grade A; four studies rated Grade B1 and thirteen B2. Seven studies were rated Grade C. A wide range of failure rates for amalgam were reported from 0 - 58%. However, in the context of a controlled clinical environment in a developed country the failure rate varied between 0 and 22%. CONCLUSION: Amalgam remains an appropriate choice of material for the restoration of the primary dentition. However, factors other than durability are increasingly influencing its use in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 135 条
[31]  
Hadani PE(1986)Restorative treatment pattern and longevity of amalgam restorations in Denmark Acta Odontol Scand 44 343-9
[32]  
Pinto AS(1997)Longevity and cariostatic effects of everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results J Dent Res 76 1387-96
[33]  
Gordon M(2004)Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth Acta Odontol Scand 62 37-45
[34]  
Gorfil C(1990)The fate and survival of amalgam and preformed crown molar restorations placed in a specialist paediatric dental practice.[erratum appears Br Dent J 169 285-8
[35]  
Segal S(1985)Two-year clinical evaluation of a proprietary composite resin for the restoration of primary posterior teeth Pediatr Dent 7 14-7
[36]  
Mass E(2003)Changes in dentists’ attitudes and practice in paediatric dentistry Europ J Paediatr Dent 4 21-8
[37]  
Hickel R(2001)British Society of Paediatric Dentistry: a policy document on the use of amalgam in paediatric dentistry Int J Paediatr Dent 11 233-44
[38]  
Voss A(2002)Effectiveness of glass-ionomer (ART) and amalgam restorations in the deciduous dentition: results after 3 years Caries Res 36 437-13
[39]  
Holland IS(1980)A two-year clinical study of a carvable composite resin used as class II restorations in primary molars J Dent Child 47 405-32
[40]  
Walls AW(2003)Clinicians’ choices of restorative materials for children Aust Dent J 48 221-7