Durability of amalgam in the restoration of class II cavities in primary molars: a systematic review of the literature.

被引:23
作者
Kilpatrick N.M. [1 ]
Neumann A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Dentistry, Royal Children's Hospital and Oral Health Research Unit, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Dental amalgam; primary teeth; restorations;
D O I
10.1007/BF03262564
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To review the available literature on the durability of amalgam when used to restore interproximal (class II) cavities in primary molars. METHODS: The literature was searched using OVID Medline and EMBASE from 1966 to 2006. The search plan of the electronic databases included: "dental amalgam or amalgam or alloy" and "deciduous or primary or milk or first or baby or natal" or "tooth or teeth or dentition" and "permanent restorations or permanent fillings". Relevant prospective clinical studies were reviewed by 2 reviewers against a set of defined criteria. Papers were graded according to the number of criteria met as A = >90%, B1 = 75%, B2 = 50% and C = <50%. RESULTS: No study achieved a Grade A; four studies rated Grade B1 and thirteen B2. Seven studies were rated Grade C. A wide range of failure rates for amalgam were reported from 0 - 58%. However, in the context of a controlled clinical environment in a developed country the failure rate varied between 0 and 22%. CONCLUSION: Amalgam remains an appropriate choice of material for the restoration of the primary dentition. However, factors other than durability are increasingly influencing its use in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 135 条
[1]  
Barr-Agholme M(1991)A two-year clinical study of light-cured composite and amalgam restorations in primary molars Dent Mater 7 230-3
[2]  
Oden A(1975)A comparison between stainless steel crowns and multisurface amalgams in primary molars J Dent Child 42 474-8
[3]  
Dahllof G(2007)Restoration of class II cavities in primary teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: An evidence based assessment of the literature Eur Arch Paed Dent 1 13-20
[4]  
Modeer T(1996)A pilot study of the marginal adaptation and surface morphology of glass-cermet cements Quintessence Int 27 493-501
[5]  
Braff MH(2006)Restoration of primary teeth: clinical criteria for assessment of the literature Eur Arch Paed Dent 7 48-52
[6]  
Chadwick BL(1981)Use of amalgam and stainless steel restorations for primary molars J Dent Child 48 420-2
[7]  
Evans DJR(1999)Clinical performance and caries inhibition of resin-modified glass ionomer cement and amalgam restorations J Am Dent Assoc 130 1459-66
[8]  
Chu CH(2002)Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation Br Dent J 193 339-42
[9]  
King NM(1996)Atraumatic restorative treatment and glass-ionomer sealants in a school oral health programme in Zimbabwe: evaluation after 1 year Caries Res 30 428-33
[10]  
Lee AM(2000)Clinical and radiographic assessment of Class II esthetic restorations in primary molars Pediatr Dent 22 479-85