Gene flow among different teosinte taxa and into the domesticated maize gene pool

被引:0
作者
Marilyn L. Warburton
Garrison Wilkes
S. Taba
Alain Charcosset
Celine Mir
Fabrice Dumas
Delphine Madur
Susanne Dreisigacker
Claudia Bedoya
B. M. Prasanna
C. X. Xie
Sarah Hearne
Jorge Franco
机构
[1] USDA ARS Corn Host Plant Resistance Research Unit,Department of Biology
[2] University of Massachusetts-Boston,undefined
[3] CIMMYT,undefined
[4] Apdo.,undefined
[5] INRA/INA-PG/UPS/CNRS,undefined
[6] Station de Génétique Végétale,undefined
[7] Institute of Crop Science,undefined
[8] CAAS,undefined
[9] IITA,undefined
来源
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution | 2011年 / 58卷
关键词
Crop evolution; Gene flow; Maize (; ssp. ; ); Molecular markers; Teosinte;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Maize (Zea mays L. ssp. mays) was domesticated from one wild species ancestor, the Balsas teosinte (Zea mays ssp. parviglumis) about 9000 years ago. Higher levels of gene diversity are found in teosinte taxa compared to maize, following domestication and selection bottlenecks. Diversity in maize can be increased via gene flow from teosinte, which has certainly occurred from various taxa, but the rate of flow from different teosinte taxa and the final impact on maize evolution has been difficult to measure. One hundred populations from six Zea taxa, both domesticated (maize) and wild (teosinte), including domesticated landraces from Asia, Africa, and the Americas, were genotyped with 17 SSR markers using 15 individuals per population. Overall levels of diversity were high, and populations could be distinguished based on markers. Relationships between populations followed most published reports, or can now help resolve previously conflicting reports. Gene flow into maize from different teosinte groups, and gene flow between different teosintes, was estimated. Evidence for contributions from the Balsas teosintes and from Chalco teosintes (Z. mays ssp. mexicana) to the maize gene pool was found, as well as from Chalco into ssp. mexicana race “Durango” and Z. mays ssp. huehuetenengensis. These contributions are almost certainly the result of post-domestication (and ongoing) exchanges. This information must give more impetus to in situ conservation of teosinte species, and use of these teosintes to continue to direct the evolution of maize, especially in response to new diseases, insect pests, and other biotic and abiotic stresses.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1261
页数:18
相关论文
共 156 条
  • [41] Renfroe W(2008)The earliest archaeological maize ( Am J Bot 95 1240-1253
  • [42] Blanton A(2008) L.) from highland Mexico: new accelerator mass spectrometry dates and their implications Crop Sci 48 617-624
  • [43] Dubreuil P(1979)Patterns of population structure in maize landraces from the Central Valleys of Oaxaca in Mexico Crop Imp 6 16-18
  • [44] Warburton M(2006)Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data Maydica 52 49-58
  • [45] Chastanet M(undefined)Maize introduction into Europe: the history reviewed in the light of molecular data undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [46] Hoisington D(undefined)Genetic structure and diversity of european flint maize populations determined with SSR analyses of individuals and bulks undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [47] Charcosset A(undefined)Historical divergence and gene flow in the genus undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [48] Ellstrand NC(undefined)Selection versus demography: a multilocus investigation of the domestication process in maize undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [49] Garner LC(undefined)A weak effect of background selection on trinucleotide microsatellites in maize undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [50] Hegde S(undefined)Fine scale genetic structure in the wild ancestor of maize ( undefined undefined undefined-undefined