Factors Influencing Lingual Nerve Paraesthesia Following Third Molar Surgery: A Prospective Clinical Study

被引:21
作者
Charan Babu H.S. [1 ]
Reddy P.B. [2 ]
Pattathan R.K.B. [3 ]
Desai R. [4 ]
Shubha A.B. [5 ]
机构
[1] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Debari, Udaipur, 313024, Rajasthan
[2] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hitkarini Dental College & Hospital, Jabalpur, MP
[3] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Bapuji Dental College & Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka
[4] Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dental Sciences and Hospital, Davangere, Karnataka
[5] Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Pacific Dental College & Hospital, Udaipur, Rajasthan
关键词
Impaction; Lingual nerve injury (LNI); Neurosensory testing; Third molar;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-012-0391-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Objectives: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and various risk factors influencing the sensory deficit in case of lingual nerve injury (LNI) in individuals whose impacted mandibular third molars are surgically removed under local anesthesia. Materials and Methods: The study was based on the data collected prospectively from a random group of 100 patients who underwent surgical removal of bony impacted lower third molar in a dental hospital. Details of the patient, reason for extraction, type of impaction, method of surgery and signs and symptoms of nerve injury are recorded. Neurosensory testing was done to evaluate the LNI at 1 week, 1 months, 3 months and 6 months interval. Comparison was carried out using Chi square test. For all tests a P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The incidence of LNI was 4 % and of temporary in nature which recovered well within 6 months postoperatively. The age of the patient above 26 years, lingual flap retraction, depth of impaction (red line ≥10 mm) and duration of surgery above 30 min were the significant factors for causing LNI. Conclusions: The age of the patient, depth of impaction, lingual flap retraction and longer duration of surgery are significant risk factors for LNI during mandibular third molar surgery. Greater care should be taken to avoid the morbidity and patients should be informed well ahead about the probable complications. © 2012, Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India.
引用
收藏
页码:168 / 172
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Shepherd J.P., Brickley M., Surgical removal of third molars, BMJ, 309, pp. 620-621, (1994)
[2]  
Kandasamy S., Rinchuse D.J., Rinchuse D.J., The wisdom behind third molar extractions, Aust Dent J, 54, pp. 284-292, (2009)
[3]  
Blondeau F., Daniel N.G., Extraction of impacted mandibular third molars: postoperative complications and their risk factors, J Can Dent Assoc, 73, (2007)
[4]  
Osborn T.P., Frederickson G., Small I.A., Torgerson T.S., A prospective study of complications related to mandibular third molar surgery, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 43, pp. 767-769, (1985)
[5]  
Brann C.R., Brickley M.R., Shepherd J.P., Factors influencing nerve damage during lower third molar surgery, Br Dent J, 186, pp. 514-516, (1999)
[6]  
Bui C.H., Seldin E.B., Dodson T.B., Types, frequencies, and risk factors for complications after third molar extraction, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 61, pp. 1379-1389, (2003)
[7]  
Susarla S.M., Blaeser B.F., Magalnick D., Third molar surgery and associated complications, Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin N Am, 15, pp. 177-186, (2003)
[8]  
Loescher A.R., Smith K.G., Robinson P.P., Nerve damage and third molar removal, Dent Update, 30, pp. 375-382, (2003)
[9]  
Lopes V., Mumenya R., Feinmann C., Harris M., Third molar surgery: an audit of the indications for surgery, post-operative complaints and patient satisfaction, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 33, pp. 33-35, (1995)
[10]  
Gomes A.C., Vasconcelos B.C., de Oliveira e Silva E.D., da Silva L.C., Lingual nerve damage after mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 63, pp. 1443-1446, (2005)