Imaging of the sacroiliac joint involvement in seronegative spondylarthropathies

被引:0
作者
Giuseppe Guglielmi
Giacomo Scalzo
Alessia Cascavilla
Marina Carotti
Fausto Salaffi
Walter Grassi
机构
[1] University of Foggia,Department of Radiology
[2] Scientific Institute Hospital “CSS”,Department of Radiology
[3] University of Ancona,Department of Radiology
[4] Hospital Torrette,Department of Rheumatology
[5] Università Politecnica delle Marche,undefined
来源
Clinical Rheumatology | 2009年 / 28卷
关键词
Computed tomography; Inflammatory back pain; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sacroiliac joint; Sacroiliitis; Seronegative spondylarthropathies;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Involvement of the sacroiliac joints is the first predominant finding of all seronegative spondylarthropathies (SpA) subsets, such as ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, and undifferentiated SpA. Although conventional radiography is indicated in the initial evaluation of sacroiliac joints diseases, it is often insensitive for demonstrating the early changes of sacroiliitis, so other imaging techniques typically are often necessary to clarify the pathology and for establishing the early diagnosis of seronegative SpA. Other imaging modalities, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), ultrasonography (US), and bone scintigraphy have improved visualization of inflammatory changes at the sacroiliac joints (SIJ). CT scans are indicated for disease processes in which bony destruction or ossification may occur. MRI has been proposed as an imaging method to detect sacroiliitis earlier. MRI can identify both inflammation and structural changes caused by inflammation, while radiographs show only structural changes. MRI may be particularly useful in making a diagnosis of SpA. Musculoskeletal US has an increasing and relevant role in the evaluation of SpA mainly for its ability to assess joint and periarticular soft tissue involvement and in particular for its capacity to detect enthesitis. US assessment in general is safe, noninvasive, and comparably cheap, showing itself as a complimentary tool to clinical evaluation in SpA; nevertheless, it is very user dependent. Bone scintigraphy is at most of limited diagnostic value for the diagnosis of established AS, including the early diagnosis of probable/suspected sacroiliitis. The main aim of this study is to introduce the clinical and radiological aspects of the SIJ involvement in SpA, particularly the contribution of the different imaging techniques.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 341 条
  • [1] De Angelis R(2007)Prevalence of spondyloarthropathies in an Italian population sample: a regional community-based study Scand J Rheumatol 36 14-21
  • [2] Salaffi F(2005)MArche Pain Prevalence Investigation Group (MAPPING) Study. Prevalence of musculoskeletal conditions in an Italian population sample: results of a regional community-based study. I. The MAPPING study Clin Exp Rheumatol 23 819-828
  • [3] Grassi W(1999)Studying patients with inflammatory back pain and arthritis of the lower limbs clinically and by magnetic resonance imaging: many, but not all patients with sacroiliitis have spondyloarthropathy Rheumatology 38 831-836
  • [4] Salaffi F(1991)The European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy Arthritis Rheum 34 1218-1227
  • [5] De Angelis R(1990)Criteria of the classification of spondylarthropathies Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic 57 85-89
  • [6] Grassi W(1984)Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria Arthritis Rheum 27 361-368
  • [7] Brandt J(2000)Scientific contributions of ankylosing spondylitis patient advocacy groups Curr Opin Rheumatol 12 239-247
  • [8] Bollow M(2003)Radiographic assessment of sacroiliitis by radiologists and rheumatologists: does training improve quality? Ann Rheum Dis 62 519-525
  • [9] Haberle J(2004)How to diagnose axial spondylarthritis early Ann Rheum Dis 63 535-543
  • [10] Dougados M(1978)Quantitative 99mTc pertechnetate scanning of the sacroiliac joints. A follow-up study of patients with suspected sacroiliitis Scand J Rheumatol 7 93-96