Process Management Self-Efficacy: Scale Development and Validation

被引:0
作者
I. M. Jawahar
Zach J. Mohammed
机构
[1] Illinois State University,Department of Management & Quantitative Methods, College of Business
[2] University High School,undefined
来源
Journal of Business and Psychology | 2022年 / 37卷
关键词
Self-efficacy; Task performance; Contextual performance; Process management; Scale development; Scale validation;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Managers, responsible for the work of others, are crucial for organizational success. A key function of managers is coordination and management of process(es) to ensure task completion (Bounty & Drucker-Godard in Human Relations, 72(3), 565-587, 2019; Mintzberg, 2009). Self-efficacy beliefs related to process management are likely to predict how well an individual manages processes. Thus, process management self-efficacy beliefs are crucial to managerial performance and, consequently, to organizational success. The lack of a scale to measure process management self-efficacy is a significant oversight, which this study attempts to remedy. In study 1, using data from four separate samples, we developed a process management self-efficacy scale (PMSES). To provide preliminary evidence of construct validity, we conducted studies 2 and 3. Using data collected from managers, their supervisors, and co-workers, results of study 2 indicated that managers’ process management self-efficacy was related to task performance evaluated by their superiors and to contextual performance rated by their co-workers. In addition, process management self-efficacy predicted additional variance in task and contextual performance, beyond a measure of generalized self-efficacy. In study 3, managers’ process management self-efficacy beliefs were related to their subordinates’ performance. We discuss implications for theory, research, and practice.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 352
页数:13
相关论文
共 174 条
[1]  
Ahire SL(2000)The impact of design management and process management on quality: An empirical investigation Journal of Operations Management 18 549-575
[2]  
Dreyfus P(1991)Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validity Journal of Applied Psychology 76 732-740
[3]  
Anderson JC(2008)A leadership self-efficacy taxonomy and its relation to effective leadership The Leadership Quarterly 19 595-608
[4]  
Gerbing DW(2007)Promoting more integrative strategies for leadership theory-building American Psychologist 62 25-33
[5]  
Anderson DW(2010)Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 83 189-206
[6]  
Krajewski HT(2007)The job demands-resources model: State of the art Journal of Managerial Psychology 22 309-328
[7]  
Goffin RD(2019)Major life events in family life, work engagement, and performance: A test of the work-home resources model International Journal of Stress Management 26 238-249
[8]  
Jackson DN(1977)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change Psychological Review 84 191-215
[9]  
Avolio BJ(1983)Self-evaluative and self-efficacy mechanisms governing the motivational effects of goal systems Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45 1017-1028
[10]  
Bakker AB(2012)Perfectionism, self-efficacy and OCB: The moderating role of gender Personnel Review 41 590-608