Using Neural Network Analysis to Define Methods of DINA Model Estimation for Small Sample Sizes

被引:0
作者
Zhan Shu
Robert Henson
John Willse
机构
[1] The University of North Carolina at Greensboro,
[2] Educational Testing Service,undefined
来源
Journal of Classification | 2013年 / 30卷
关键词
Neural network; Diagnostic Classification Model; MCMC;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The DINA model is a commonly used model for obtaining diagnostic information. Like many other Diagnostic Classification Models (DCMs), it can require a large sample size to obtain reliable item and examinee parameter estimation. Neural Network (NN) analysis is a classification method that uses a training dataset for calibration. As a result, if this training dataset is determined theoretically, as was the case in Gierl’s attribute hierarchical method (AHM), the NN analysis does not have any sample size requirements. However, a NN approach does not provide traditional item parameters of a DCM or allow for item responses to influence test calibration. In this paper, the NN approach will be implemented for the DINA model estimation to explore its effectiveness as a classification method beyond its use in AHM. The accuracy of the NN approach across different sample sizes, item quality and Q-matrix complexity is described in the DINA model context. Then, a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) estimation algorithm and Joint Maximum Likelihood Estimation is used to extend the NN approach so that item parameters associated with the DINA model are obtained while allowing examinee responses to influence the test calibration. The results derived by the NN, the combination of MCMC and NN (NN MCMC) and the combination of JMLE and NN are compared with that of the well-established Hierarchical MCMC procedure and JMLE with a uniform prior on the attribute profile to illustrate their strength and weakness.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 194
页数:21
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
de la Torre J(2008)An Empirically Based Method of Q-Matrix Validation for the DINA Model: Development and Applications Journal of Educational Measurement 45 343-362
[2]  
de la Torre J(2009)DINA Model and Parameter Estimation: A Didactic Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 34 115-130
[3]  
DE LA TORRE J(2004)Higher Order Latent Trait Models for Cognitive Diagnosis Psychometrika 69 333-353
[4]  
DOUGLAS J(2007)Making Diagnostic Inferences about Cognitive Attributes Using the Rule-Space Model and Attribute Hierarchy Method Journal of Educational Measurement 44 325-340
[5]  
Gierl M(2008)Using the Attribute Hierarchy Method to Identify and Interpret Cognitive Skills that Produce Group Differences Journal of Educational Measurement 45 65-89
[6]  
GIERL M(1989)Using Restricted Latent Class Models to Map the Sill Structure of Achievement Items Journal of Educational Measurement 26 301-321
[7]  
ZHENG Y(2001)Cognitive Assessment Models with Few Assumptions, and Connections with Nonparametric Item Response Theory Applied Psychological Measurement 25 258-272
[8]  
CUI Y(2004)The Attribute Hierarchical Method for Cognitive Assessment: A Variation on Tatsuoka’s Rule-Space Approach Journal of Educational Measurement 41 205-237
[9]  
Haertel E(1999)A Straightforward Approach to Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods for Item Response Models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24 146-178
[10]  
JUNKER BW(2006)Measurement of Psychological Disorders Using Cognitive Diagnosis Models Psychological Methods 11 287-305