Parental Leave Policies and Second Births: A Comparison of Czechia and Slovakia

被引:0
作者
Anna Šťastná
Jiřina Kocourková
Branislav Šprocha
机构
[1] Charles University,Department of Demography and Geodemography, Faculty of Science
[2] Slovak Academy of Sciences,Institute for Forecasting
来源
Population Research and Policy Review | 2020年 / 39卷
关键词
Fertility; Second births; Family policy; Parental leave; Czechia; Slovakia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper investigates the transition to second births in Czechia and Slovakia in the context of the development of parental leave policies since the beginning of the 1990s. We focus on two countries that share many similarities in terms of their economic, cultural and institutional settings but differ in their parental leave policies. We analyse to what extent the significant changes introduced to the parental leave system, particularly in Czechia, have influenced second-birth timing in two low-fertility countries that are experiencing a shift to the late childbearing pattern. Using data from the Czech Statistical Office and the Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic, we employ the parity-cohort method and use duration-specific second-birth rates and the second-birth progression ratio to investigate changes in the spacing and quantum of second births for women who had their first child between 1992 and 2013. The results show that for an increasing proportion of mothers in Czechia, the option to claim higher parental benefits for shorter periods of leave contributed to the shortening of the birth interval between their first and second children. No such changes in birth intervals were detected in Slovakia, where no important changes regarding the flexibility or amount of the parental benefit were introduced. The difference in the development of second-birth rates between the two countries was also reflected in a growing difference in the share of mothers having two children within 10 years of the first birth.
引用
收藏
页码:415 / 437
页数:22
相关论文
共 89 条
[1]  
Aassve A(2009)Childcare cash benefits and fertility timing in Norway European Journal of Population 25 67-88
[2]  
Lappegård T(2010)Cash-benefit policy and childbearing decisions in Norway Marriage and Family Review 46 149-169
[3]  
Aassve A(1999)Childbearing trends in Sweden 1961–1997 European Journal of Population 15 1-24
[4]  
Lappegård T(2006)Social differentials in speed-premium effects in childbearing in Sweden Demographic Research 14 51-69
[5]  
Andersson G(2010)The post-communist fertility puzzle Population Research and Policy Review 29 193-231
[6]  
Andersson G(2003)The world turned upside down: Below replacement fertility, changing preferences, and family-friendly public policy in 21 OECD countries Journal of European Social Policy 13 209-227
[7]  
Hoem JM(2010)Family policy and fertility: Fathers’ and mothers’ use of parental leave and continued childbearing in Norway and Sweden Journal of European Social Policy 20 45-57
[8]  
Duvander AZ(2017)Child home care allowance and the transition to second- and third-order births in Finland Population Research and Policy Review 36 607-630
[9]  
Billingsley S(2011)Parental leave—possibility or trap? Does family leave length effect Swedish Women’s labour market opportunities? European Sociological Review 27 435-450
[10]  
Castles FG(2016)Fertility and family policies in Central and Eastern Europe after 1990 Comparative Population Studies 41 3-56