Soil erosion modelling using GIS-integrated RUSLE of Urpash watershed in Lesser Himalayas

被引:0
作者
Mohmmad Idrees Attar
Yogesh Pandey
Sameena Naseer
Shabir Ahmad Bangroo
机构
[1] SKUAST-Kashmir,Division of soil and water conservation engineering, College of Agricultural Engineering and Technology
[2] SKUAST-Kashmir,Division of Soil Science
关键词
DEM; GIS; RUSLE; Soil erosion; Urpash watershed;
D O I
10.1007/s12517-024-11893-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Urpash watershed located in the Lesser Himalayas (India) has experienced substantial soil erosion challenges. Therefore, the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) model, integrated within a Geographic Information System (GIS) environment, was employed to evaluate the spatial distribution of erosion within the Urpash watershed. To execute the model, inputs such as ASTER DEM, annual rainfall data for the year 2019, Land Use Land Cover (LULC) maps, and soil texture data were utilized as data sources. The average annual soil loss across the Urpash watershed ranged from 0 to 193.15 t/ha/year, with the mean annual loss estimated at 22.46 t/ha/year. Zonal statistical analysis revealed that barren land and open forests were more susceptible to erosion, with estimates of 86.22 and 68.46 t/ha/year, respectively. In contrast, waterbodies, built-up areas, and evergreen forests exhibited lower erosion susceptibility. Based on soil loss values, the watershed was categorized into six sub-watersheds. WS6 and WS3 were identified with severe soil erosion (40–80 t/ha/year), WS2 with very high (20–40 t/ha/year), WS5 with high erosion (10–20 t/ha/year) and WS1 and WS4 with moderate erosion. (5–10 t/ha/year). Thus, the sub-watershed priority was in the order of WS6 > WS3 > WS2 > WS5 > WS4 > WS1. Our findings indicated that regions with high slope gradients and barren land were hotspots for severe and very severe erosion. While acknowledging the existence of other factors such as soil type, intensity of rainfall, land cover, and land practices, the study found their impact to be comparatively less pronounced than the dominant roles played by high-slope areas and barren lands. The severity data from sub-watersheds can inform targeted conservation strategies to combat soil erosion effectively within the Urpash watershed.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 108 条
[1]  
Alitane A(2022)Water erosion monitoring and prediction in response to the effects of climate change using RUSLE and SWAT equations: case of R’Dom watershed in Morocco Land 11 93-308
[2]  
Essahlaoui A(2003)Soil erosion prediction using RUSLE for central Kenyan highland conditions Agric Ecosyst Environ 97 295-69
[3]  
El Hafyani M(2020)Application of predictor variables in spatial quantification of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen using regression kriging in the North Kashmir Forest Himalayas CATENA 193 104632-3570
[4]  
El Hmaidi A(1979)A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology Hydrol Sci J 24 43-86
[5]  
El Ouali A(2015)Soil degradation in India: challenges and potential solutions Sustainability 7 3528-169
[6]  
Kassou A(2006)Soil erosion science: Reflections on the limitations of current approaches CATENA 68 73-183
[7]  
Van Rompaey A(2010)Water erosion prediction using the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) in a GIS framework, central Chile Chilean J Agric Res 70 159-69
[8]  
Angima SD(1974)Vegetation canopy reflectance Remote Sens Environ 3 175-434
[9]  
Stott DE(2019)Evaluation of soil erosion vulnerability on the basis of exposure, sensitivity, and adaptive capacity: a case study in the Zhuxi watershed, Changting, Fujian Province, Southern China Catena 177 57-961
[10]  
O’neill MK(1983)Estimation of soil erosion in India J Irrig Drain Eng 109 419-20