Target blood pressure level for the treatment of elderly hypertensive patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:0
作者
Yoichi Takami
Koichi Yamamoto
Hisatomi Arima
Atsushi Sakima
机构
[1] Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine,Department of Geriatric and General Medicine
[2] Faculty of Medicine,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health
[3] Fukuoka University,Health Administration Center
[4] University of the Ryukyus,undefined
[5] Nishihara-cho,undefined
来源
Hypertension Research | 2019年 / 42卷
关键词
Hypertension; The elderly; Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Randomized clinical trial;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although recent systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) support the benefit of blood pressure (BP) treatment in the elderly, the optimized target BP level remains controversial. We performed a SR to determine the clinical benefit of antihypertensive treatments with a target systolic BP (SBP) of <140 mmHg in the elderly. We searched for RCTs comparing intensive and less intensive treatments or placebo and active treatments reported until May 2017 and identified 11 RCTs in which the target or on-treatment SBP in the intensive or active treatment was less than 140 mmHg. Among the RCTs, 6 RCTs with primary or subanalysis results for patients aged 70 years or older were finally chosen for the meta-analysis. We found that intensive lowering of BP did not reduce the risk ratio (RR) of composite cardiovascular outcomes (95% CI: 0.67–1.05, p = 0.13). By contrast, intensive lowering of BP achieved RR reductions of 24% for all-cause death (0.63–0.92) and of 39% for cardiovascular death (0.48–0.77). Intensive lowering of BP did not alter the incidence of stroke (0.63–1.23) and serious adverse events (SAEs) (0.93–1.09). In conclusion, intensive antihypertensive regimens targeting SBP < 140 mmHg did not significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular diseases compared to that of less intensive treatments, but did reduce the risk of death without increasing adverse events in patients aged 70 years or older. These findings support the benefit of intensive treatment targeting SBP to ≤140 mmHg in the elderly.
引用
收藏
页码:660 / 668
页数:8
相关论文
共 152 条
[1]  
Miura K(2013)Epidemiology of hypertension in Japan: where are we now? Circ J 77 2226-31
[2]  
Nagai M(2008)Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older N Engl J Med 358 1887-98
[3]  
Ohkubo T(2018)Hypertension Limbo: balancing benefits, harms, and patient preferences before we lower the bar on blood pressure Ann Intern Med 168 369-70
[4]  
Beckett NS(2014)The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension (JSH 2014) Hypertens Res 37 253-390
[5]  
Peters R(2016)Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years JAMA 315 2673-54
[6]  
Fletcher AE(2017)Pharmacologic Treatment of Hypertension in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older to Higher Versus Lower Blood Pressure Targets: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians and the American Academy of Family Physicians Annals of Internal Medicine 166 430-64
[7]  
Staessen JA(2017)Benefits and Harms of Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment in Adults Aged 60 Years or Older Annals of Internal Medicine 166 419-62
[8]  
Liu L(1985)Mortality and morbidity results from the European Working Party on high blood pressure in the elderly trial Lancet 1 1349-41
[9]  
Dumitrascu D(1997)Randomised double-blind comparison of placebo and active treatment for older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. The Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) Trial Investigators Lancet 350 757-86
[10]  
Wilt TJ(1998)Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. HOT Study Group Lancet 351 1755-72