The effect of novel environment and sex on the additive genetic variation and covariation in and between emergence body weight and development period in the cowpea weevil, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera, Bruchidae)

被引:55
作者
Guntrip J. [1 ]
Sibly R.M. [1 ]
Holloway G.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sch. of Animal and Microbial Science, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AJ, Whiteknights
关键词
Callosobruchus maculatus; G-matrix; genetic variation; novel environment; trade-off;
D O I
10.1038/hdy.1997.23
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Progeny from full-sib/half-sib families of a population of Callosobruchus maculatus near genetic equilibrium were reared either in an ancestral (30°C, 70 per cent relative humidity) or in a novel (25°C, 45 per cent relative humidity environment. The life history traits, emergence body weight and development period were measured in both sexes. Insects developed faster and emerged heavier at a higher temperature and humidity. For both sexes, in the ancestral environment additive genetic variation and 'narrow-sense' heritability estimates were higher for body weight, the morphological trait, than for development period, the primary fitness trail. For both sexes, matrix analyses revealed significant differences between the estimated additive genetic variance-covariance (G) matrices from each environment. In the novel environment, the evolved genetic architecture appeared to break down, possibly as a result of novel gene expression; the trade-off between emergence body weight and development period was disrupted with an associated increase in additive genetic variation for both life history traits. In both environments, female insects developed more slowly and emerged heavier than male insects. Matrix analyses show significant differences between the G-matrices of each sex, suggesting that different constraints may operate in the two sexes.
引用
收藏
页码:158 / 165
页数:7
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]  
Atkinson D., Temperature and organism size - A biological law for ectotherms?, Adv. Ecol. Res., 25, pp. 1-58, (1994)
[2]  
Becker W.A., Manual of Procedures in Quantitative Genetics, 4th Edn., (1984)
[3]  
Bell G., Measuring the cost of reproduction. I. The correlation structure of the life table of a plankton rotifer, Evolution, 38, pp. 300-313, (1984)
[4]  
Bell G., Measuring the cost of reproduction. II. The correlation structure of the life tables of five freshwater invertebrates, Evolution, 38, pp. 314-326, (1984)
[5]  
Bell G., Koufopanou V., The cost of reproduction, Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 3, pp. 83-131, (1986)
[6]  
Bergeson O., Wool D., The process of adaptation of flour beetles to new environments, Genetica, 77, pp. 3-13, (1988)
[7]  
Charlesworth B., Optimization models, quantitative genetics, and mutation, Evolution, 44, pp. 520-538, (1990)
[8]  
Charnov E.L., Phenotypic evolution under Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection, Heredity, 62, pp. 113-116, (1989)
[9]  
De Laguerie P., Olivieri I., Atlan A., Gouyon P.-H., Analytic and simulation models predicting positive genetic correlations between traits linked by trade-offs, Evol. Ecol., 5, pp. 361-369, (1991)
[10]  
Falconer D.S., Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd Edn., (1989)