How professional designers use magic-based inspirations: development of a usage guideline and analysis of impact on design process

被引:0
作者
Lalita Haritaipan
Celine Mougenot
Miki Saijo
机构
[1] Tokyo Institute of Technology,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Imperial College London,Dyson School of Design Engineering
[3] Tokyo Institute of Technology,Department of Transdisciplinary Science and Engineering
[4] Tokyo Institute of Technology,Department of Innovation Science
来源
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) | 2019年 / 13卷
关键词
Magic; Creativity; Product design; Interaction design; Design tool; Design process;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To support the introduction of magic in product interaction design, magic effects together with technical clues is shown to be effective inspirations for ‘creative and practical’ products in novice designers. In this paper, we aim to develop a guideline to use the magic-based inspiration cards effectively for novice designers. To do this, six professional designers with three levels of design experiences were invited: junior (2 years), intermediate (7 years), and senior (more than 12 years). The verbal protocol analysis revealed that when providfed with the cards, the designers produced more ideas and concerned more about expected behavior of products. On the other hand, design experience negatively impact fluidity of ideas. Our findings suggested that design process is correlated with fluidity and elaboration, but not originality and feasibility. Finally, a guideline on how to use the magic-based tool effectively is developed based on the approaches carried by professional designers.
引用
收藏
页码:659 / 671
页数:12
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Atman CJ(1999)A comparison of freshman and senior engineering design processes Des. Stud. 20 131-152
  • [2] Chimka JR(2007)Engineering design processes: a comparison of students and expert practitioners J. Eng. Edu. 96 359-379
  • [3] Bursic KM(2016)A model of flexible thinking in contemporary education Think. Skills Creat. 22 74-85
  • [4] Nachtmann HL(2016)Heuristics-based design process Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 10 369-386
  • [5] Atman CJ(2017)Distinguishing between ‘macro’ and ‘micro’ possibility thinking: seen and unseen creativity Think. Skills Creat. 26 60-70
  • [6] Adams RS(2015)Fixation and creativity in concept development: the attitudes and practices of expert designers Des. Stud. 38 54-91
  • [7] Cardella ME(1994)Design expertise amongst student designers J. Art Des. Edu. 13 39-56
  • [8] Turns J(1991)Protocol analysis of the engineering systems design process Res. Eng. Des. 3 15-22
  • [9] Mosborg S(1990)Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design AI Mag. 11 26-232
  • [10] Saleem J(2013)Inspiration peak: exploring the semantic distance between design problem and textual inspirational stimuli Int. J. Des. Creat. Innov. 1 215-443