Test-retest precision of functional magnetic resonance imaging processed with independent component analysis

被引:0
作者
G. Nybakken
M. Quigley
C. Moritz
D. Cordes
V. Haughton
M. Meyerand
机构
[1] Department of Radiology,
[2] The University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics,undefined
[3] 600 Highland Avenue,undefined
[4] Madison,undefined
[5] WI 53792,undefined
[6] Department of Medical Physics,undefined
[7] University of Wisconsin,undefined
[8] Madison,undefined
[9] Wisconsin,undefined
[10] Department of Radiology,undefined
[11] University of Washington,undefined
[12] Seattle,undefined
[13] Washington,undefined
来源
Neuroradiology | 2002年 / 44卷
关键词
fMRI Independent component analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was designed to compare the test-retest precision of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data processed with independent component analysis (ICA) and the same data analyzed with a conventional model-dependent method (Student's-t mapping). Volunteers underwent two or three iterations of visual and auditory stimuli, while data were collected for fMRI scans. The scan data were separately processed with ICA and with Student's-t mapping (STM). As a measure of test-retest precision, concurrence ratios were calculated for each subject and each task as the number of voxels that were activated by two iterations of a task divided by the average number of voxels activated in each repetition. In 28 test-retest comparisons, the average concurrence ratio was 0.69±0.10 for ICA and 0.65±0.13 for the conventional method, a statistically insignificant difference. In fMR image data of block stimulus paradigms, ICA had similar test-retest precision to a conventional model-dependent method.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 406
页数:3
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据