Negotiating (dis-)engagement in K-12 blended learning

被引:0
作者
Nina Bergdahl
Melissa Bond
机构
[1] Stockholm University,Department of Computer and Systems Sciences (DSV)
[2] University College London,undefined
来源
Education and Information Technologies | 2022年 / 27卷
关键词
Engagement; Disengagement; Work pace; Teacher leadership; K-12; Blended learning;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
It is well-recognised that engagement is critical for learning and school success. Engagement (and disengagement) are, however, also influenced by context. Thus, as digital technologies add complexity to the educational context, they influence classroom leadership, lesson designs and related practices, and thereby engagement. Despite being critical, engagement and disengagement are not well explored concerning these influences, with a lack of research undertaken within socially disadvantaged schools. In this qualitative study, 14 classroom observations were conducted, during five months, in twelve classes in an upper secondary school in Sweden, along with dialogues with teachers (n=12) and students (n=32). The data were analysed using thematic analysis and descriptive statistics. Identified themes include digital context, teacher leadership, engagement and disengagement. A network of relations between the (dis-)engagement compound and themes is presented. The results identified processes in which engagement shifted into disengagement and vice versa; in particular, that the intention of active learning does not automatically translate to active learning for all students, although teachers employed a higher work pace than did their students. Teacher self-efficacy and awareness of how to manage digital technologies in and outside the classroom was found to play a vital role in facilitating engagement. Understanding the (dis-)engagement compound in blended learning environments is key to inform active and visible learning for future research and supportive organisational structures.
引用
收藏
页码:2635 / 2660
页数:25
相关论文
共 147 条
  • [1] Bandura A(1977)Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change Psychological Review 84 191-215
  • [2] Barab S(2004)Design-based research: Putting a stake in the ground The Journal of the Learning Sciences 13 1-14
  • [3] Squire K(2020)Student engagement and disengagement in TEL – The role of gaming, gender and non-native students Research in Learning Technology 28 2020-130
  • [4] Bergdahl N(2018)The use of learning technologies and student engagement in learning activities Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 13 113-111
  • [5] Nouri J(2018)Designing for engagement in TEL – a teacher-researcher collaboration Designs for Learning 10 100-983
  • [6] Bergdahl N(2019)Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school Computers & Education 149 103783-43
  • [7] Fors U(2020)Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school Computers and Education 149 103783-83
  • [8] Hernwall P(2020)Disengagement, engagement and digital skills in technology-enhanced learning Education and Information Technologies 149 957-247
  • [9] Knutsson O(2019)Interaction and presence in the virtual classroom: An analysis of the perceptions of students and teachers in online and blended Advanced Placement courses Computers and Education 132 31-14
  • [10] Bergdahl N(2016)Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process Learning and Instruction 43 76-63