Imaging Factors Impacting on Accuracy and Radiation Dose in 3D Printing

被引：5

作者：

de Lima Moreno J.J. ^{[1
]}

Liedke G.S. ^{[2
]}

Soler R. ^{[1
]}

da Silveira H.E.D. ^{[3
]}

da Silveira H.L.D. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Maxillofacial Prosthesis, School of Dentistry, Universidad de la Republica, Las Heras 1925, Montevideo

[2] Department of Stomatology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria

[3] Department of Surgery and Orthopedics, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre

来源：

Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery | 2018年 / 17卷 / 4期

关键词：

3D printing; Cone beam computed tomography; Multidetector computed tomography; Radiation dosage;

D O I：

10.1007/s12663-018-1098-z

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Objectives: To compare reconstructed area and surface roughness of 3D models acquired using nine image acquisition protocols. Radiation dose was also compared among acquisition protocols. Methods: A dry craniofacial specimen was scanned using three CT devices (a cone beam CT, a 16-channel fan beam CT, and a 64-channel fan beam CT), with three different acquisition protocols each. Nine 3D models were manufactured using polylactic acid. Surface roughness and reconstructed area were determined for each 3D model. The radiation dose during acquisitions was measured using lithium crystals. ANOVA was used to compare the data among the 3D models. Linear function optimization techniques based on stochastic variables were applied to identify the most suitable protocol for use. Results: For surface roughness, statistically significant differences were observed among all 3D models and the specimen. For reconstructed area, CBCT and one CT-16 channel protocols originated 3D models statistically significant different from the specimen. Higher radiation doses were observed with fan beam CT acquisitions. Conclusions: All three CT devices were suitable for 3D printing when used at full resolution. The highest reconstruct area vs. radiation dose ratio was found for 64-channel CT devices. © 2018, The Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons of India.

引用

页码：582 / 587

页数：5

共 25 条

[1]

Sannomiya E.K., Silva J.V., Brito A.A., Saez D.M., Angelieri F., Dalben G.S., Surgical planning for resection of an ameloblastoma and reconstruction of the mandible using a selective laser sintering 3D biomodel, Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod, 106, pp. 36-40, (2008)

[2]

Erickson D.M., Chance D., Schmitt S., Mathis J., An opinion survery of reported benefits from the use of stereolithographic models, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 57, pp. 1040-1043, (1999)

[3]

Sykes L.M., Parrott A.M., Owen C.P., Snaddon D.R., Applications of rapid prototyping technology in maxillofacial prosthetics, Int J Prosthodont, 17, pp. 454-459, (2004)

[4]

Suomalainen A., Stoor P., Mesimaki K., Kontio R.K., Rapid prototyping modelling in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a two year retrospective study, J Clin Exp Dent, 7, pp. e605-e612, (2015)

[5]

Bibb R., Winder J., A review of the issues surrounding three-dimensional computed tomography for medical modelling using rapid prototyping techniques, Radiography, 16, pp. 78-83, (2010)

[6]

Santolaria J., Jimenez R., Rada M., Loscos F., Error compensation method for improving the accuracy of biomodels obtained from CBCT data, Med Eng Phys, 36, pp. 397-404, (2014)

[7]

Winder J., Bibb R., Medical rapid prototyping technologies: state of the art and current limitations for application in oral and maxillofacial surgery, J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 63, pp. 1006-1015, (2005)

[8]

Liang X., Lambrichts I., Sun Y., Denis K., Hassan B., Li L., Pauwels R., Et al., A comparative evaluation of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT). Part II: on 3D model accuracy, Eur J Radiol, 75, pp. 270-274, (2010)

[9]

Salmi M., Paloheimo K.S., Tuomi J., Wolff J., Makitie A., Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing), J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 41, pp. 603-609, (2013)

[10]

Lermen C.A., Liedke G.S., Silveira H.E.D., da Silveira H.L., Mazzola A.A., de Figueiredo J.A., Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption, J Appl Oral Sci, 183, pp. 303-307, (2010)

← 1 2 3 →