Just the facts: ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter placement

[1] Davis EM(2021)Difficult intravenous access in the emergency department: performance and impact of ultrasound-guided IV insertion performed by nurses Am J Emerg Med 46 539-544

[2] Feinsmith S(2022)Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12 CD03434-897

[3] Amick AE(2021)Intersocietal position statement J Ultrasound Med 40 895-747

[4] Tada M(2010)Comparison of infection rates among ultrasound-guided versus traditionally placed peripheral intravenous lines J Ultrasound Med 29 741-75

[5] Yamada N(2010)Effects of vein width and depth on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous success rates J Emerg Med 39 70-1303

[6] Matsumoto T(2009)What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access Acad Emerg Med 16 1298-1140

[7] Takeda C(2012)The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity Am J Emerg Med 30 1134-555

[8] Furukawa TA(2018)Ultrasound-guided intravenous catheter survival impacted by amount of catheter residing in the vein Emerg Med J 35 550-405

[9] Watanabe N(2007)Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation J Emerg Med 33 401-238

[10] Adhikari S(2014)Incidence of intravenous contrast extravasation: increased risk for patients with deep brachial catheter placement from the emergency department Emerg Radiol 21 235-1054

[1] Davis EM(2021)Difficult intravenous access in the emergency department: performance and impact of ultrasound-guided IV insertion performed by nurses Am J Emerg Med 46 539-544

[2] Feinsmith S(2022)Ultrasound guidance versus landmark method for peripheral venous cannulation in adults Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12 CD03434-897

[3] Amick AE(2021)Intersocietal position statement J Ultrasound Med 40 895-747

[4] Tada M(2010)Comparison of infection rates among ultrasound-guided versus traditionally placed peripheral intravenous lines J Ultrasound Med 29 741-75

[5] Yamada N(2010)Effects of vein width and depth on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous success rates J Emerg Med 39 70-1303

[6] Matsumoto T(2009)What you see (sonographically) is what you get: vein and patient characteristics associated with successful ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous placement in patients with difficult access Acad Emerg Med 16 1298-1140

[7] Takeda C(2012)The effect of vessel depth, diameter, and location on ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous catheter longevity Am J Emerg Med 30 1134-555

[8] Furukawa TA(2018)Ultrasound-guided intravenous catheter survival impacted by amount of catheter residing in the vein Emerg Med J 35 550-405

[9] Watanabe N(2007)Predictors of success in nurse-performed ultrasound-guided cannulation J Emerg Med 33 401-238

[10] Adhikari S(2014)Incidence of intravenous contrast extravasation: increased risk for patients with deep brachial catheter placement from the emergency department Emerg Radiol 21 235-1054