Task preparation as a mnemonic: The benefits of drawing (and not drawing)

被引:0
作者
Jeffrey D. Wammes
Brady R. T. Roberts
Myra A. Fernandes
机构
[1] University of Waterloo,Department of Psychology
来源
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review | 2018年 / 25卷
关键词
Episodic memory; Recognition; Perceptual learning; Drawing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Creating a visual representation of an item through drawing affords that item a substantive memory benefit, relative to several control tasks. Recent findings demonstrate the robustness of this drawing effect across several stimulus classes, irrespective of encoding time, setting, age group, or memory measure. The advantage for drawn information has been attributed to the integrated contributions of at least three components of visual production through drawing, which can independently facilitate memory: elaborative, motoric, and pictorial. In the current work, we investigated the importance of the elaborative process one must engage in while preparing to draw, and directly tested whether this generative period alone was sufficient to improve memory. Participants were prompted to either draw or write out presented words, and were provided with a 1- or 2-s preparatory period prior to completing the prompted task. Critically, on a subset of the trials, participants were prevented from completing the prompted task. There was strong evidence in support of better memory for drawn items, which replicates the drawing effect commonly observed in prior work. Interestingly, following prompts to draw, there was also a reliable memory benefit of the preparatory period alone. In other words, simply engaging in the elaborative process of preparing to draw (i.e., without completing the drawing) was enough to produce a reliable increase in later memory relative to actually writing.
引用
收藏
页码:2365 / 2372
页数:7
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Bäckman L(1984)Aging effects in free recall: An exception to the rule Human Learning 3 53-69
  • [2] Nilsson LG(1985)Prerequisites for lack of age differences in memory performance Experimental Aging Research 11 67-73
  • [3] Bäckman L(1986)New evidence on the nature of the encoding of action events Memory & Cognition 14 339-346
  • [4] Nilsson L-G(1997)Why can't most people draw what they see? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 609-621
  • [5] Bäckman L(1972)Levels of processing: A framework for memory research Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 11 671-684
  • [6] Nilsson L-G(1984)Motor programme information as a separable memory unit Psychological Research 46 283-299
  • [7] Chalom D(2018)The Surprisingly Powerful Influence of Drawing on Memory Current Directions in Psychological Science 27 302-308
  • [8] Cohen DJ(1990)Encoding information for future action: Memory for to-be-performed tasks versus memory for to-be-recalled tasks Memory & Cognition 18 568-578
  • [9] Bennett S(2010)Visual selection contributes to artists' advantages in realistic drawing Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 4 93-102
  • [10] Craik FI(2012)Perceptual constancies and visual selection as predictors of realistic drawing skill Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 6 124-136