An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments

被引：101

作者：

Czerkawski B.C. ^{[1
]}

Lyman E.W., III ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Educational Technology Program, University of Arizona, Science and Technology Park, Tucson, 85747, AZ

[2] Student Affairs Systems Group, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85719, AZ

来源：

TechTrends | 2016年 / 60卷 / 6期

关键词：

Engagement; Higher education; Instructional design; Instructional design models; Online learning environments;

D O I：

10.1007/s11528-016-0110-z

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Many approaches, models and frameworks exist when designing quality online learning environments. These approaches assist and guide instructional designers through the process of analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation of instructional processes. Some of these frameworks are concerned with student participation, some with motivation and some with student success. All these variables affect active participation and engagement of the student to some degree but the main concern is how to design online instruction conducive to high level of engagement. Therefore, this paper presents an instructional design framework along with a set of strategies that could be used to foster learner engagement in online learning. This framework is result of an extensive literature review on student engagement and is aimed at summarizing the results in a cohesive way for online instructors. For e-learning design and development to be successful online designers and instructors need better approaches to increasing student engagement and its authors hope that proposed framework provides such an approach. © 2016, Association for Educational Communications & Technology.

引用

页码：532 / 539

页数：7

共 36 条

[1]

Artino A.R., Online or face-to-face learning? Exploring the personal factors that predict students' choice of instructional format, The Internet and Higher Education, 13, 4, pp. 272-276, (2010)

[2]

Artino A.R., Stephens J.M., Academic motivation and self-regulation: A comparative analysis of undergraduate and graduate students learning online, The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 3-4, pp. 146-151, (2009)

[3]

Bakia M., Jones K., Means B., Murphy R., Toyama Y., U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development, evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies, (2010)

[4]

Carina R.M., Kuh G.D., Klein S.P., Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages, Research in Higher Education, 47, 1, pp. 1-32, (2006)

[5]

Chen P.D., Lambert A.D., Guidry K.R., Engaging online learners: The impact of web-based learning technology on college student engagement, Computers & Education, 54, pp. 1222-1232, (2010)

[6]

Chen W.-C., Actual and preferred teacher feedback on student blog writing, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 4, pp. 402-414, (2014)

[7]

Coates H., A model of online and general campus based student engagement, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32, 2, pp. 121-141, (2007)

[8]

Collins A., Brown J.S., Newman S.E., Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics (Technical Report No. 403). BBN Laboratories, (1987)

[9]

Dixon M.D., Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What do students find engaging?, Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10, 2, pp. 1-13, (2010)

[10]

Durrington V.A., Berryhill A., Swafford J., Strategies for enhancing student interactivity in an online environment, College Teaching, 54, 1, pp. 190-193, (2006)

← 1 2 3 4 →