Home medicines reviews and residential medication management reviews in Western Australia

被引:0
作者
Petra Czarniak
Laetitia Hattingh
Tin Fei Sim
Richard Parsons
Bronwen Wright
Bruce Sunderland
机构
[1] Curtin University,School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences
[2] Gold Coast Health,School of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
[3] Griffith University,School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences
[4] Curtin University,undefined
来源
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | 2020年 / 42卷
关键词
Accredited pharmacists; Australia; Home medicines reviews; Medication review; Residential medication management reviews;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background Australian government funding for Residential Medication Management Reviews and Home Medicines Reviews commenced in 1997 and 2001 respectively. Limited data are available on their provision in Australia. Objective To investigate the extent and characteristics of Home Medicines Review and Residential Medication Management Review services provided by accredited pharmacists practising in Western Australia. Setting Pharmacists in Western Australia accredited by the Australian Association of Consultant Pharmacy or Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia. Method A paper questionnaire was developed and sent to 198 accredited pharmacists in Western Australia in June 2017. Simple descriptive statistics summarised demographic information and other responses. Logistic regression evaluated factors associated with the frequency of provision of Home Medicines Reviews. Main outcome measure Frequency and factors influencing services provided. Results Of 102 (51.5%) questionnaires returned, 67 (65.7%) respondents were female. Many were aged between 31 and 40 years (53; 52.0%). Most were accredited by the Australian Association of Consultant Pharmacy (101; 99.0%) and mainly offered Home Medicines Reviews (70; 68.6%). Home Medicines Reviews provided over the previous 12 months were limited in frequency with one quarter providing either 1–10 (27; 26.5%) or 21–50 (28; 27.5%) reviews. The median “average” preparation, interview and report writing times, plus communication with other health professionals aggregated to 175.0 min (interquartile range: 140.0–235.0 min) for Home Medicine Reviews and 110.0 min (90.0–140.0) for Residential Medication Management Reviews. Pharmacists born overseas and those who were accredited for a longer time were associated with performing 51 or more Home Medicines Reviews annually. Only one-third (36/101; 35.6%) agreed the current payment was appropriate. Most agreed their Home Medicines Reviews (92/96; 95.8%) and Residential Medication Management Reviews (26/28; 92.9%) provided improved patient outcomes. Over 97% of accredited pharmacists intended to continue to remain accredited. Conclusions Wide variations were evident in the times taken for tasks associated with performing reviews. Most respondents considered their medication reviews contributed to improved patient outcomes. The wide variation in times taken for the reviews suggests a tiered structure for service provision, with appropriate payment within each tier, since most consider current remuneration inadequate.
引用
收藏
页码:567 / 578
页数:11
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Silva ROS(2019)Pharmacist-participated medication review in different practice settings: service or intervention? An overview of systematic reviews PloS ONE. 14 e0210312-639
[2]  
Macêdo LA(2015)From “retailers” to health care providers: transforming the role of community pharmacists in chronic disease management Health Policy. 119 628-186
[3]  
dos Santos GA(2001)Randomised controlled trial of clinical medication review by a pharmacist of elderly patients receiving repeat prescriptions in general practice BMJ. 323 1340-740
[4]  
Aguiar PM(2014)Effects of a pharmacist-led structured medication review in primary care on drug-related problems and hospital admission rates: a randomized controlled trial Scand J Prim Health Care. 32 180-418
[5]  
de Lyra DP(2014)Medication review practices in European countries Res Social Admin Pharm. 10 731-428
[6]  
Mossialos E(2016)Clinical medication review in Australia: a systematic review Res Soc Adm Pharm. 12 384-148
[7]  
Courtin E(2014)Improving medication management after a hospitalization with pharmacist home visits and electronic personal health records: an observational study Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 6 1-204
[8]  
Naci H(2009)The effectiveness of collaborative medicine reviews in delaying time to next hospitalization for patients With heart failure in the practice setting: results of a cohort study Circ Heart Fail. 2 424-685
[9]  
Benrimoj S(2010)Drug burden index and potentially inappropriate medications in community-dwelling older people Drugs Aging. 27 135-32
[10]  
Bouvy M(2016)Pharmacist-led home medicines review and residential medication management review: the Australian model Drugs Aging. 33 199-186