The role of ultrasound in the assessment of osteoporosis: A review

被引:0
作者
C. F. Njeh
C. M. Boivin
C. M. Langton
机构
[1] University Hospital Birmingham NHS Trust,Medical Physics Department
[2] Royal Hull Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Hull,Centre for Metabolic Bone Disease, Hull Royal Infirmary
[3] Queen Elizabeth Hospital,Bone Densitometry Services, Medical Physics Department
来源
Osteoporosis International | 1997年 / 7卷
关键词
Bone mineral density (BMD); Bone structure; Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA); Fracture; Osteoporosis; Speed of sound (SOS); Quantitative ultrasound (QUS);
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Osteoporosis is now being recognized as a “silent epidemic” and there is an increasing need to improve its diagnosis and management. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) measurement [broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and velocity] is emerging as an alternative to photon absorptiometry techniques in the assessment of osteoporosis. The fundamental principles governing ultrasound measurements are discussed, and some of the commercially available clinical systems are reviewed, particularly in relation to data acquisition methods. A review of the published in vivo and in vitro data is presented. The general consensus is that ultrasound seems to provide structural information in addition to density. The diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasound measurement of the calcaneus in the prediction of hip fracture has been shown by recent large prospective studies to be similar to hip bone mineral density (BMD) measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and superior to spine BMD. Ultrasound has also been shown to correlate better with the type of hip fracture (intertrochanteric or cervical) than BMD and to provide comparable diagnostic sensitivity to spine BMD in vertebral fractures. It has also been observed that combining the results of both ultrasound and DXA BMD significantly improved hip fracture prediction. Areas where further research is required are identified.
引用
收藏
页码:7 / 22
页数:15
相关论文
共 411 条
[91]  
Mazess R(1994)Three quantitative ultrasound parameters reflect bone structure Calcif Tissue Int 55 46-5
[92]  
Trempe J(1994)New ultrasonic methods of quantitative assessment of bone status Eur J Ultrasound 1 23-8
[93]  
Barden H(1995)Broadband ultrasonic attenuation: are current measurement techniques inherently inaccurate? Br J Radiol 68 1212-9
[94]  
Lees B(1994)Broadband ultrasonic attenuation imaging: a new imaging technique of the os calcis Calcif Tissue Int 54 83-10
[95]  
Stevenson JC(1996)Ultrasound bone imaging: clinical evaluation of skeletal status Osteoporosis Int 6 84-4
[96]  
Langton CM(1996)Electronic phantom for the ultrasonic assessment of bone Osteoporosis Int 6 87-3
[97]  
Ali AV(1996)Prediction of bone strength from ultrasound velocity and apparent density Osteoporosis Int 6 83-undefined
[98]  
Riggs CM(1996)Which ultrasound parameters could be combined with DXA to provide a better prediction of hip fracture in the elderly? The EPIDOS prospective study Osteoporosis Int 6 84-undefined
[99]  
Evans GP(1995)Ultrasound in the evaluation of osteoporosis: a comparison with bone mineral density at distal radius Br J Radiol 68 476-undefined
[100]  
Bonfield W(1993)Apparent velocity of ultrasound (AVU) at the patella in comparison to bone mineral density at the lumbar spine in normal males and females Bone Miner 23 243-undefined