Immediate postoperative morbidity in patients with indwelling double-J stent versus overnight-externalized ureteral catheter after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, randomized study

被引:0
作者
Alejandro Mercado
Mario I. Fernández
Pedro Recabal
Daniela Fleck
Rodrigo Ledezma
Francisco Moya
Francisco Sepúlveda
Roberto Vilches
Diego Reyes
Fernando Marchant
机构
[1] Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile,Department of Urology
[2] Clínica Alemana,Department of Urology
[3] Universidad del Desarrollo,undefined
来源
Urolithiasis | 2013年 / 41卷
关键词
Nephrolithiasis; Percutaneous nephrolithotomy; Tubeless; Double-J stent; Ureteral catheter;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The conventional technique for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) ends by placing a nephrostomy tube within the access tract. However, feasibility and safety of tubeless PNL have been widely demonstrated. In this modification, a ureteral stent is usually left in place instead of the nephrostomy tube. The aim of this study is to compare the use of a postoperative indwelling double-J stent versus an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter in patients undergoing tubeless PNL. Sixty-eight patients undergoing tubeless PNL were randomized either for a postoperative double-J stent (group 1) or for an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter (group 2). Outcomes evaluated included postoperative pain, hospital stay length, incidence of hemorrhagic complications, residual lithiasis and urinary leakage. Groups were similar according to age, sex, body mass index and stone burden. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative pain, incidence of perirenal hematomas, residual lithiasis and urinary leakage. However, patients in group 1 presented longer hospital stays (3.7 ± 1.7 vs. 1.9 ± 0.3 days; p < 0.001) and greater hematocrit drops (4.9 ± 2.2 vs. 2.1 ± 1.8 %; p < 0.001). Our results confirm that among patients undergoing tubeless PNL, both alternatives (i.e. leaving a double-J stent or an overnight-externalized ureteral catheter) are reliable and safe. However, further considerations, like the need of double-J stent removal under cystoscopy, need to be taken into account when deciding which modality to use.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 256
页数:3
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] Bellman GC(1997)Tubeless percutaneous renal surgery J Urol 157 1578-1582
  • [2] Davidoff R(2011)The efficacy and safety of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis Urol Res 39 401-410
  • [3] Candela J(2011)Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy is associated with less pain and shorter hospitalization compared with standard or small bore drainage: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials Urology 77 1293-1298
  • [4] Gerspach J(2010)Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy—the new standard of care? J Urol 184 1261-1266
  • [5] Kurts S(2011)Postoperative morbidity of tubeless versus conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective and comparative study Urol Res 39 477-481
  • [6] Stout L(2007)Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 21 169-172
  • [7] Yuan H(2008)Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what about replacing the double-J stent with a ureteral catheter J Endourol 22 273-275
  • [8] Zheng S(2001)Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients J Endourol 15 711-713
  • [9] Lui L(2007)Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy—should a stent be an integral part? J Urol 178 921-924
  • [10] Han P(2009)Double-j stenting compared with one night externalized ureteral catheter placement in tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy J Endourol 23 27-31